4.8 • +11k Ratings
Save
Print
Edit
What is common to the greatest number gets the least amount of care. Men pay most attention to what is their own; they care less for what is common; or at any rate they care for it only to the extent to which each is individually concerned. - Aristotle
The above quote by Aristotle represents the fundamental idea behind the tragedy of commons, a phenomenon that often occurs with the consumption of private goods. Follow along to understand the differences between private, public, and quasi-public goods and their implications.
A public good possesses the following characteristics:
Street lighting is an example of a public good. This is a service that all citizens get to enjoy no matter how much they pay in taxes. Additionally, if one person is using the street lights, it does not exclude others from using them.
Theoretically, it would be possible to provide public goods privately. However, if people decide not to pay, it leads to market failure, as it is impossible to exclude the ‘non-payers’ from using the public good. Further examples of public goods include national defence, public roads, motorways, and bridges.
A public good is both non-rival and non-excludable.
To better understand what public goods are, let’s take a look at the definition of private goods.
Private goods constitute the majority of goods there are. They have the following characteristics:
A house is an example of a private good. The house owner can exclude you from using or buying their house (the good is excludable).
An example of rivalry can be a bag of crisps. If you eat the last bag of crisps at home, your family couldn’t eat it and the available quantity of crisps decreases for them. In other words, the quantity you consumed diminished the amount available to others.
A private good - is both rival and excludable.
Public goods can be differentiated into two categories: pure public goods and quasi-public goods.
A pure public good is a good that is fully non-rival and non-excludable.
National defence is a pure public good since it is impossible to exclude free-riders.
The majority of public goods, however, are quasi-public or non-pure public goods.
Quasi-public goods have characteristics of both private and public goods, including partial excludability and partial rivalry.
For these types of goods, certain methods can be implemented to exclude free-riders.
A government can put new tolls on a motorway to exclude free riders.
The market can provide these types of goods. However, taking into account the concept of non-rivalry, it can be beneficial to provide public goods for free in order to encourage as much consumption of them as possible.
In other words, if public and quasi-public goods don’t have capacity restraints, optimal consumption levels take place when they are provided for free.
Imagine if street lighting wasn’t a public good. In this case, a company would set up street lighting and charge people for using it in an attempt to make a profit. However, even if none or very few people ended up paying for street lighting services, the community would still enjoy all the benefits of having street lighting. This is known as the free-rider problem. The price mechanism fails if there are free riders, as consumers will not choose to pay for a good they can get for free.
The free-rider problem occurs when, due to the non-excludable nature of public goods, consumers decide to not pay for the good at all and 'free-ride' instead.
Free-riding minimises profits for the company, as it is not possible for them to exclude the non-payers from using the service whilst still providing it to paying customers. Removing street lighting from the non-payers will remove street lighting for everyone. As a result, there is no incentive to provide public goods privately through the market. This is the idea behind a missing market, which results in market failure.
Missing markets occur when there is no incentive to provide a good through the market due to the free-rider problem.
Additionally, it is complicated to set the correct prices for public goods, as it is difficult to know how much value they will create for consumers. Producers are likely to overvalue the benefits of public goods in order to increase prices and therefore their profits. Meanwhile, consumers tend to undervalue these benefits in order to receive lower prices. This results in market failure.
This is another reason why firms might be disincentivised to provide public goods, leading to market failure and resulting in governments having to provide public goods.
The tragedy of the commons is an economic concept that suggests that people will always act in their own self-interest and overconsume common resources. As a result, common resources are destroyed or depleted. We can explain a lot of the environmental market failure by applying the concept of the tragedy of the commons.
Recent technological advances make it possible for governments to charge prices on quasi-public goods.
License plate recognition and other new technological measures allow for governments and local transport authorities to charge motor vehicles for using roads. This was previously not possible due to the lack of technical means to do so.
This type of technology also allows the government to charge different prices during different hours of the day to disincentivise people from using their vehicles during rush hour. For example, when roads are not congested and thus non-rival, it is possible to charge drivers less than during rush hour when rivalry is high.
The answer to whether public goods could be provided privately is far from simple. Even though people might be willing to pay for certain public goods and willing to pay to avoid certain public 'bads', it is unlikely that we will ever get rid of the free-rider problem.
A public good is defined as a good that is both non-excludable and non-rival.
Public goods are non-excludable, non-rival and non-rejectable.
Public goods are non-excludable, meaning consumers cannot be excluded from using them, and non-rival, meaning if one person uses a public good, it does not reduce its availability for others.
Private goods are excludable, as the owners of the good can prevent others from consuming it, and rival, as when a consumer consumes a private good, they diminish the quantity of that private good available to others.
Public goods exist in order to avoid the free-rider problem from causing missing markets and ultimately market failure.
Public goods are beneficial as they allow for all members of society to have access to certain essential goods and services they otherwise might not have been able to access if they weren't public goods.
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
