Suggested languages for you: |
|

## All-in-one learning app

• Flashcards
• NotesNotes
• ExplanationsExplanations
• Study Planner
• Textbook solutions

# Random Nature of Radioactive Decay Save Print Edit
• Astrophysics • Atoms and Radioactivity • Electricity • Energy Physics • Engineering Physics • Fields in Physics • Force • Further Mechanics and Thermal Physics • Magnetism • Measurements • Mechanics and Materials • Medical Physics • Nuclear Physics • Particle Model of Matter • Physical Quantities and Units • Physics of Motion • Radiation • Space Physics • Turning Points in Physics • Waves Physics Have you ever wondered where radiation comes from and what causes radiation to be created? Most atoms are radioactive to some degree, which means they emit radiation. This radiation emission happens randomly, without any cause, based on probabilities and not according to a fixed schedule. This means that we can never predict when the next radiation emission will happen! This article covers the random nature of radioactive decay.

## Definition of the random nature of radioactive decay

Radioactive decay is the process of atoms emitting radiation to achieve another configuration. This radiation can be in the form of alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, or neutron particles. During the emission of radiation, an atom changes according to the rules of nuclear equations. What is left after the emission will have a different level of radioactivity.

Atoms emit radiation if they are inherently unstable: for any specific isotope at a certain energy level, every second, there is a certain probability that it will emit an alpha particle. The same goes for the other forms of radiation. These are all different probabilities, and some of those probabilities might be zero, meaning that a particular atom will never undergo a certain type of radioactive decay. These probabilities are entirely determined, but the actual emission process is random: we only know the probability.

This is just like throwing a (fair, cubic) dice every second. You know that the probability of throwing a 6 is every throw, but the actual process of creating the outcome of the throws is random. You do not know if you will throw a 6 in 6 or 20 throws. However, with a large sample size of, for example, 6 billion throws, you know that you will throw approximately 1 billion sixes. Two dice, Wikimedia Commons Public Domain.

In the same way, we can never know when an unstable atom will emit, say, beta radiation, but over longer and longer timescales, we do have an increasingly good idea of how much beta radiation will come from a material, i.e. how many atoms will have emitted beta radiation.

By the random nature of radioactive decay, we mean that for every atom, there are known probabilities that they will emit radiation (and thus decay radioactively) in the next second. Still, the fact that all we have is a probability makes this a random process. We can never determine ahead of time if an atom will decay in the next second or not.

## Half-lives and the random nature of radioactive decay

If we have a lot of identical atoms within a sample (for example, in a chunk of material) that all have a certain probability per second of decaying, then you can imagine that at some point, only half of the original number of atoms are left in the sample. The bigger the probability of decaying per second, the less time it takes until only half is left.

The half-life of an atom (a certain isotope at a certain energy level) is the expected time it takes for a very large number of those atoms to decay until there is only half of the original number of those atoms left.

So, a short half-life indicates that an atom is very radioactive: its probability of decaying in the next second is high.

Suppose we have an atom of which the probability of decaying in the next second is . We now take many of those atoms and wait for one second. After this second, roughly half of the atoms have decayed (this is what the probability of means). We conclude that the half-life of this type of atom is one second.

The random nature of radioactive decay now tells us that after one half-life, it is not guaranteed that exactly half of the original atoms remain, but that this is just the most likely, and the average outcome. Any other number of remaining atoms has a lower probability of happening. However, the chances of exactly half of the atoms remaining from an initially very large number of atoms are still minimal.

### Examples of half-lives

As every radioactive atom has a half-life that we can measure, we can give a few examples and show that the half-lives of different isotopes can differ by wildly different time scales. The half-life of a carbon-14 atom is about 5700 years, while the half-life of a uranium-235 atom is about 700 million years! This means that carbon-14 is more radioactive than uranium-235, as carbon-14 isotopes have a higher probability of decaying than uranium-235 in the next second. On the other end of the spectrum, copernicium-277 has a half-life of just under a millisecond, making the average lifespan of a copernicium-277 atom very short: this isotope is highly radioactive.

In general, more massive elements tend to be more radioactive because their larger nuclei are more likely to have an unstable excess of internal energy. This is why the periodic table of elements is only known up until a certain nucleus size: the atoms and isotopes with bigger nucleus sizes are too unstable for us to easily 'see' them. The probability that such a heavy atom decays in the next microsecond is too high for us to study these atoms well.

## Causes of the random nature of radioactive decay

It might be disappointing, but we will have to accept that every atom simply has an intrinsic probability of decaying every second. For stable isotopes, and thus not radioactive, this probability is zero. For radioactive isotopes, this probability can be measured and is known for many isotopes. The factors that cause this exact probability, and therefore the real causes of the random nature of radioactive decay, are far outside the scope of this article. Upright pencil, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0.

You can think of a radioactive atom as an unstable upright pencil. It is in a high-energy state and wants to fall to a lower-energy state. It would only take a tiny gust to make the pencil fall. Still, we know nothing about the exact wind conditions around the pencil, only about the general weather (which can be compared to the probability of radioactive decay). In our eyes, the pencil has a tendency to fall, but we do not know when the deciding nudge will happen. We can only say that in a storm, the pencil will most likely fall earlier than in calm weather, just like atoms with a smaller half-life will most likely decay earlier than atoms with a larger half-life.

## Effects of the random nature of radioactive decay

The random nature of radioactive decay states that some atoms in a sample survive while other atoms of the same type decay. This is not a distinguishment based on any difference in properties between the atoms but purely based on probabilities. This also means that only a (random) portion of identical atoms will have decayed at any given time.

The random nature of radioactive decay also lets us calculate the probabilities of the survival of an atom after a specific time. For example, after its half-life, there is a chance that an atom in a sample still hasn't decayed yet. After 8 half-lives, there is a chance that an atom is still intact. Or, equivalently, after 8 half-lives, the most likely outcome is that of the original atoms remain. The random nature of decay now tells us that there is no way of knowing exactly which atoms remain.

Lastly, the famous exponential graph that illustrates the smooth exponential decay of atoms displays that the original isotope count is roughly halved after every half-life and then draws a smooth line through the data points. This exponential decay is correct on large scales (see the article on half-lives for more on this), but on smaller scales, this graph will be more 'jumpy': in some intervals, there might be no decay, and in other intervals, there might be lots of atoms that decay, purely by chance. The graph will look more like the one shown below. The familiar exponential graph with a small number of atoms, showing the effects of the randomness of decay, StudySmarter Originals.

## Examples and experiments on the random nature of radioactive decay

A good experiment to measure the radiation that atoms emit can be done using a Geiger-Müller counter, which is a device that measures alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. If it measures a product of radioactive decay (particle or wave), it will record it as an event.

If you were to hold any radioactive substance close to a Geiger-Müller counter, it would record events at random intervals: there would be no pattern in the intervals between measurement events. This patternless random event recording is experimental evidence that radioactive decay is random in nature. The average frequency of the events will decrease as time goes on because fewer and fewer atoms survive to produce the radiation and cause another event.

Consider two radioactive samples, both with a mass of 1 kilogram. The first sample contains radioactive isotopes with a short half-life, and the other consists of radioactive isotopes with a longer half-life. The sample with a short half-life will have many events occur in rapid succession, but a sample with a long half-life will have longer pauses between events as it will take longer for events to occur. However, the events of both samples will be randomly spaced and thus entirely unpredictable.

## Random Nature of Radioactive Decay - Key takeaways

• Radiation can be defined as either alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, or neutrons originating in atoms.
• After emitting radiation, the atom is changed into either a different type of atom, a different isotope or into being at a different energy level.
• For any specific atom (a certain isotope at a certain energy level), every second, there is a probability that it decays.
• We can never determine ahead of time if an atom will decay in the next second or not; we only know the probability of decay.
• After one half-life, it is not guaranteed that exactly half of the original atoms remain, but that this is just the most likely, and the average outcome.
• After 8 half-lives, an atom can still be intact, and the probability of this scenario is .
• The random intervals between events that a Geiger-Müller counter records are experimental evidence that radioactive decay is random.

The random nature of radioactive decay means that atoms do not decay according to a fixed schedule but rather a fixed probability of decay every second.

Radioactive decay occurs primarily in the Earth's crust and mantle. This decay produces heat, which is one of the reasons the inside of the Earth is hot.

The cause of the random nature of radioactive decay lies in quantum field theory. It has to do with the randomness of quantum-mechanical processes, mainly those that dictate transitions between different energy levels.

The effects of the random nature of radioactive decay include that identical atoms will decay at different times, so only a portion of identical atoms will have decayed at any given time.

Radioactive decay is a random process because it is an example of a quantum-mechanical process, and those are random.

## Final Random Nature of Radioactive Decay Quiz

Question

Given an atom, is the probability of decay in the next second fixed or random?

Fixed

Show question

Question

For a given atom, is the probability of decay in the next hour larger or smaller than in the next second?

Larger

Show question

Question

If the probability of decay in the next second is 10%, what is the probability of decay in the next minute?

99.8%

Show question

Question

Describe what we mean by the 'random nature of radioactive decay'.

By the random nature of radioactive decay, we mean that for every atom, there are known probabilities that they will emit radiation (and thus decay radioactively) in the next second, but the fact that all we have is a probability makes this a random process. We can never determine ahead of time if an atom is going to decay in the next second or not.

Show question

Question

Suppose we start with 1000 atoms. How many of the original atoms are left after 1 half-life of those atoms?

We don't know, but most probably approximately 500.

Show question

Question

Suppose we start with 800 atoms. How many of the original atoms are left after 2 half-lives of those atoms?

We don't know, but probably approximately 200

Show question

Question

Is it possible that after 1 half-life, we are left with as many of the original atoms as we started with?

Yes

Show question

Question

Is it possible that we are left with no original atoms after 1 half-life, even though we started with 10?

Yes, but very unlikely

Show question

Question

An atom has not decayed during a time period of 3 half-lives. Is its probability of decay in the next second bigger than it was 3 half-lives ago?

No, this always stays the same

Show question

Question

If we start with exactly 2 billion atoms, what can we say about the probability that we are left with exactly 1 billion atoms after one half-life?

This probability is very small, but not quite 0%

Show question

Question

If we have 2 atoms, can we say which atom will decay first?

No, but we bet on the atom with the shortest half-life.

Show question

Question

Describe how a Geiger-Müller counter delivers experimental evidence of the random nature of radioactive decay.

The intervals between events that the Geiger-Müller counter records are random. This means that there is no fixed schedule of decay.

Show question

Question

If we have two identical atoms, what can we say about them?

Their half-lives are the same, but they will decay at different times.

Show question

Question

If an atom has a probability of decaying in the next second of 83%, what do we expect if we put this atom in a box and have a look after a minute?

This atom has decayed almost certainly.

Show question

Question

Do there exist atoms for which their radioactive decay is not random?

No

Show question

Question

Which of the following is a correct definition of Irradiation?

The process by which an object is exposed to radiations, whether the radiations happen to be ionizing or non-ionizing.

Show question

Question

Which of the following is or are ionizing radiation?

Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and X-rays.

Show question

Question

Does a body become radioactive if it is exposed to too much radiation from a radioactive source?

No.

Show question

Question

Does a body become radioactive if it comes in contact with another radioactive source?

Yes.

Show question

Question

Which of the following radiation is the most harmful if a body gets contaminated?

Show question

Question

Which of the following ionizing radiation is the least dangerous if a body gets contaminated?

Show question

Question

Why a piece of medical equipment, like a syringe, for instance, is placed inside a lead shielding during sterilization?

To make sure the radiation from the radioactive isotope does not effect the workers.

Show question

Question

Which of the following radiations can be stopped with just a paper?

Alpha.

Show question

Question

Which of the following is the correct definition of radioactive contamination?

An object is contaminated when some radioactive particle gets on the surface of an object.

Show question

Question

Show question

Question

Which of the following precautions can be taken to avoid high levels of radiation?

Show question

Question

Which of the following is a function of a radiation monitor?

To detect and measure the strength of the radiation.

Show question

Question

Which of the following factors are important while considering the harmfulness of radiation?

All of the options listed are correct.

Show question

Question

Which of the following radiations can be prevented from penetrating the skin if a lead apron is worn?

All of the radiations listed are prevented from entering the skin.

Show question 60%

of the users don't pass the Random Nature of Radioactive Decay quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

### No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app! ## Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan. ## Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes. ## Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time. ## Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before. ## Study Sets

Have all your study materials in one place. ## Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online. ## Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses. ## Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them. ## Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders. ## Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying. ## Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically. ## Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Just Signed up?

No, I'll do it now