Mass, and mass in motion, is what makes our macroscopic lives and experiences possible — but is there a difference between an object in free fall and a car accelerating with an engine? Let’s go over the definitions of inertial and gravitational mass and find out if there is a difference.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenMass, and mass in motion, is what makes our macroscopic lives and experiences possible — but is there a difference between an object in free fall and a car accelerating with an engine? Let’s go over the definitions of inertial and gravitational mass and find out if there is a difference.
Inertia is the physical property that keeps objects at rest and unchanged. Without some external force acting on a cup resting on a table, the cup will remain still forever; a cup can’t just get up and walk away, or push itself to fall off the edge of the table. The concept of inertial mass is based on the idea that all bodies with mass have this inherent resistance to a change in motion.
Knowing that inertia is the property that makes objects resist motion, we can put together our understanding of inertia and bodies with mass to arrive at the following definition.
Inertial mass is a property of mass that determines an object’s resistance to changes in motion from an external force. A body at rest will move if enough force is applied. A body moving with a constant velocity can experience a change in velocity or direction from an external force.
The definition of inertial mass should sound familiar to you — this is just an application of Newton’s first law!
The inertial mass equation relates to the acceleration of a moving object and is therefore just a rearrangement of Newton’s second law:
To calculate the inertial mass of a moving object, you’ll need the net force, so free-body diagrams can be a useful tool for solving these problems if you aren’t given the net force right away.
Returning to our example of a cup resting on a table, try to think about what forces are in play, and how this relates to inertial mass.
The forces acting on the cup are:
The gravitational force, the weight of the cup, is pulling it down.
The normal force, the contact force between the cup and the table, is perpendicular to the table’s surface.
Static friction, the force resisting a change in motion between the two materials in contact, opposes the direction of movement when we push.
When these forces are balanced, there can be no movement of the cup. Until we apply a force greater than the force of friction, the cup will remain at rest. Now, imagine giving the cup a light, forward push with a finger. We’ve added an applied force that causes a forward acceleration — the cup now has increasing momentum, meaning its mass is in motion. The force needed to move a small cup isn’t much; the cup has a small inertial mass and doesn’t resist a change in motion very well.
What about pushing a much larger object, like the table itself, or a couch? You’ll need to apply a much greater force than you did to shift the cup forward. With a greater inertial mass, bigger objects like furniture resist a change in motion much more, and if you’re pushing heavy furniture across carpeted flooring, you’ll find that the frictional force makes the moving job even harder!
Let’s do an example using the inertial mass equation with a moving object, given the net force and acceleration.
A box is pushed across a floor with a net force of, causing the box to accelerate at. What is the inertial mass of the box?
To solve for the inertial mass, we’ll want to use Newton’s second law:
Since we already have the net force, all we need to do is use the equation for inertial mass, Newton’s second law.
.
Finding the inertial mass isn’t complicated when you’re already familiar with Newton’s first and second laws!
The force of gravity is the force causing the acceleration of all objects on Earth downwards at. If we measure the mass of an object using only gravity, we’re calculating gravitational mass.
Gravitational mass is the mass of an object calculated using the object’s response to the force of gravity alone.
The definition of gravitational mass might sound similar to measuring weight, but these are not the same. Gravitational mass is measured using a true balance, which compares a known mass to a mass we want to measure. Scales, such as a bathroom or clinic scale, measure your weight due to gravity — in other words, the downward force of your body’s mass from Earth’s gravitational field. A balance is designed to measure gravitational mass itself, since a comparison of two masses isn’t changed by the force of gravity. When the instrument is in equilibrium, the masses on both sides are equivalent, no matter where you measure it.
The gravitational mass equation is once again an application of Newton’s second law:
The difference here is that we’re using the local acceleration due to gravity, and the gravitational force instead of the net force. Physics problems solving for gravitational mass will look just like the example we went through for inertial mass. In fact, you likely have already solved for gravitational mass already when given the weight of some object on Earth to start — you just might not have realized it then!
Have we determined a difference between gravitational mass and inertial mass measurements? We learned that calculating inertial mass requires us to know the net force, yet gravitational mass only requires the gravitational force. These calculations aren’t quite the same, so there should be a difference between gravitational and inertial mass, right? The answer to this question is that inertial and gravitational mass are equivalent: experimentally, no difference has been found.
The equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass means a fundamental relationship exists. If the inertial mass and gravitational mass of an object are measured at rest, they will be identical. If the same object is moving, even at very high velocities, both measurements will still be the same. The mass of an object will not change as it accelerates, or if the laboratory we are in is accelerating!
This relationship formed the basis of Einstein’s equivalence principle, a statement of the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. The equivalence principle was a key concept that helped develop our modern understanding of gravity.
Gravitational mass is a measurement of mass due to the force and acceleration of gravity alone. Inertial mass is a measurement of the resistance of a mass to changes in motion.
Inertial and gravitational mass measurements are the same. This equivalence has been experimentally verified. If we measure an object’s inertial and gravitational mass at rest, the measurements will be equal and remain identical, even in motion at high velocities.
Some examples of inertial mass include measuring the mass of an object being pushed given the net force and forward acceleration. A couch pushed across a carpeted floor has a greater inertial mass and therefore resistance to motion than a smooth cup pushed across a polished table. An example of gravitational mass is comparing a known mass to an unknown mass on a balance.
The formula to calculate gravitational mass is m=F/a, where F is the gravitational force and a is the acceleration due to gravity.
What is the definition of Kepler’s third law?
The law of periods - the orbital period squared is proportional to the distance between the bodies cubed.
What is the definition of Kepler’s second law?
The law of equal areas - equal area is swept out in equal time, for a line connecting the sun and a planet.
What is the definition of Kepler’s first law?
The law of ellipses - planetary orbits are ellipses or other conic sections, with the sun at a fixed point.
True or false: an orbit can be hyperbolic in shape.
True.
The change in a planet’s distance from a star is ... to the change in the planet’s orbital velocity.
Inversely proportional.
Give an example of conservation of angular momentum.
An ice or roller skater is rotating circularly with their arms held out. When the skater pulls their arms in close to their chest, their rotational velocity increases.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in