Which is not a Victorian view of urban areas? That they are filled with pollutionThere is a high level of povertyThe buildings are intimidating
Which group enjoys rural areas more? Young Professionals, Retirees or Students
Which of these is not a type of urban area? Inner-city, rural farm, suburbs
Which of the following is not a benefit of the ‘Rural Idyll’? Picturesque Landscapes, Fewer services, Relaxed lifestyle or tranquillity
Content creation by StudySmarter Geography Team.
Sources verified by Gabriel Freitas.
Quality reviewed by Gabriel Freitas.
Published: 13.05.2022.
Last updated: 09.07.2025.
Urban and rural areas are two terms used to describe populated areas. The main differences between urban and rural areas are how many people live there and how built up the areas are, but there is more to it than that. It is important to understand the perceptions of both urban and rural areas, and the evaluation of living space.
Let's expand those definitions a little further.
Urban areas are places of high populations and high density, characterised by their built-up infrastructure. They are expanded by the act of urbanisation.
Rural areas are the complete opposite of urban areas, having a low population and density whilst maintaining a lack of large infrastructure.
Urban areas are perceived differently by a range of groups based on their experiences and perceptions. For example, the views of the Victorian era are dramatically different from the current day, and views of both inner-city areas and rural settings are different.
Upper-class Victorians viewed urban areas as dangerous and threatening, with pollution from factories and vast amounts of working-class people living in poverty causing them to turn away. Many of these wealthier citizens began to plan new ‘model’ cities.
Saltaire, a village in Shipley, West Yorkshire, is a Victorian model city. After being built in 1851, the village began to install many recreational buildings that caused it to be seen as a place of luxury to those of the Victorian upper class.
Urban areas have seen a vast growth of job opportunities in modern times which has greatly improved the perception of urban areas, mainly in the inner city. The presence of universities, hospitals, and access to other high-quality services make them attractive places to live, work, and study, especially because they are close to bigger towns or cities. Alongside this, social and leisure activities have drawn in young visitors and workers from surrounding areas and overseas.
However, there are also negative perceptions of urban areas today. Derelict land, high levels of poverty, and high crime levels have tarnished the view of urban areas. Media perspectives of these areas have added to these negative connotations and many urban areas receive a bad reputation as a result.
These areas are favoured by young professionals and the density of the area allows for a higher amount of job opportunities. They are also valued by students as the areas have good access to both education and entertainment. Cities are seen as bustling hives of activity and are often seen as 'the place to be'.
Similar to urban areas, inner cities are more likely to experience crime than quieter suburban locations.
Suburban areas are located between busier urban locations and the quieter countryside. There are usually large housing developments, good road networks, and access to services like shopping malls, supermarkets and leisure activities. Suburban areas are favoured by young families due to the higher numbers of schools and quieter roads. Other notable attributes are the rail networks and older populations of mainly retired people. While suburban areas are often considered safer than cities, they are normally close enough that people can access services in the city, such as hospitals.
Suburban houses have much more space and land than inner-city ones, Pixabay
Rural areas are located outside of large towns or cities. People who live here have much more space and are likely to live in a village or far out into the countryside. A very different population lives in rural areas which have completely different characteristics than urban or suburban areas.
Rural areas are seen as ideal places to live with picturesque landscapes and historic buildings. The old cottage style of housing and relaxed lifestyle (tranquillity) has also brought more to the area. Finally, a sense of community with higher amounts of socialising and less crime has made rural places perfect for older communities and growing families.
The portrayal of rural areas in the media has increased the effectiveness of this view.
Rural areas are often home to an ageing population, meaning there are likely to be limited social opportunities for younger people. Alongside this, they can be popular with tourists (honey-pot sites) which can cause seasonal employment and high density in certain months with little to no economic activity during the off-season.
Depending on what a person is looking for, rural areas can be an excellent place to live; there is far less noise pollution and air pollution. Having access to green space is supposed to improve mental health and living on a large stretch of land provides more privacy. However, rural areas can be very isolating. With fewer goods and services coming in and out of these areas, people living are more at risk of loneliness. Retirees who no longer drive are especially at risk. Though rural areas are ideal for older people in many ways, they can be difficult areas for young people as services and house maintenance become more expensive. There are also far fewer job opportunities. While rural areas provide beautiful landscapes and privacy, they can be difficult places to live in.
Some areas are entirely isolated, Pixabay
So how do we go about evaluating these diverse places to study or improve them?
The use of qualitative and quantitative data allows us to represent the quality of living spaces. Qualitative methods (non-numerical) include photographs, postcards, written documents, interviews, and social media sources. Quantitative methods (numerical) include census data, IMD data (Index of Multiple Deprivation), and surveys.
These forms of data allow councils and governments to choose how to develop the areas. What is important to remember is that depending on where people live, they will have different opinions of rural, urban and suburban areas.
There are clear differences between the two types of area. The amount of people and density is much higher in urban areas as well as the size of the infrastructure. Rural areas are typically seen as more idyllic and attractive to older people or families whilst urban areas often attract students or young professionals. Both receive different forms of negative perceptions, however, with urban areas being seen as highly polluted and noisy whilst rural places can be seen as isolated and boring.
Inner city urban areas are usually characterised by their high populations, services, and a population of many students and young professionals.
In the suburban areas, more young families and older people make up the population and there are many transport links to the inner-city.
Rural areas are more isolated and therefore have fewer services and jobs but are more tranquil and better for growing families.
The best way to evaluate living spaces is through qualitative and quantitative methods and allow councils to make changes to areas.
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models' (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
StudySmarter is a global EdTech platform helping millions of students learn faster and succeed in exams like GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, and Abitur. Our expert-reviewed content, interactive flashcards, and AI-powered tools support learners across STEM, Social Sciences, Languages, and more.
Access subjects, mock exams, and features to revise more efficiently. All 100% free!
Get your free account!