Delve into the world of the European Court of Human Rights, a vital institution responsible for upholding human rights across Europe. This discussion provides a comprehensive overview of the Court's jurisdiction and the requirements for submitting a case. Explore how the judges are selected and their term lengths, as well as examine landmark cases in human rights law and the potential impact of Brexit on the Court's relationship with the UK. Gain valuable insights into the Court's role in promoting and preserving the values enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and its significance in the evolving legal landscape.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenDelve into the world of the European Court of Human Rights, a vital institution responsible for upholding human rights across Europe. This discussion provides a comprehensive overview of the Court's jurisdiction and the requirements for submitting a case. Explore how the judges are selected and their term lengths, as well as examine landmark cases in human rights law and the potential impact of Brexit on the Court's relationship with the UK. Gain valuable insights into the Court's role in promoting and preserving the values enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and its significance in the evolving legal landscape.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is an international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights. It hears applications related to alleged violations of civil and political rights set forth in the convention by states parties. The court aims to protect individual rights and promote the democratic and rule of law system across European nations.
The ECtHR has jurisdiction over all 47 Member States of the Council of Europe. Thus, the court has the power to hear and decide on applications related to alleged violations of human rights by these Member States.
An application may be brought either by individuals, groups or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who claim to be victims of an alleged human rights violation, or by a High Contracting Party alleging that another High Contracting Party violated the convention.
In order for a case to be admissible before the ECtHR, several requirements must be met:
The procedure for submitting a case to the ECtHR is as follows:
The ECtHR is composed of one judge for each member state of the Council of Europe, currently 47 judges in total. These judges must be of high moral character, possess qualifications required for appointment to high judicial office, or be jurisconsults of recognised competence. Judges serve in their individual capacity and shall not be influenced by any external factors or pressures.
The judges of the ECtHR are selected through a multi-step process:
Judges are elected for a non-renewable term of nine years. However, the retirement age for judges is 70, and judges who turn 70 before the end of their nine-year term must retire. To ensure continuity in the court's functioning, the terms of office of one-third of the judges are renewed every three years.
The European Court of Human Rights has delivered many judgments that have significantly impacted human rights protection and interpretation in Europe. Each case has contributed to the development of human rights jurisprudence and consistently sought to promote respect for human rights in the Member States.
Landmark cases are those that have had a profound impact on human rights law and paved the way for new interpretations of human rights issues. These cases often address fundamental issues such as the right to a fair trial, freedom of expression, or the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment. Some of the most noteworthy landmark cases are detailed below.
The right to a fair trial, protected under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, is an essential component of the rule of law and a functioning democracy. The ECtHR has delivered numerous judgments related to this fundamental right, some of which include:
Freedom of expression, enshrined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, is crucial for individual self-fulfilment and maintaining a democratic society. The ECtHR has issued significant judgments defending this right, including:
Recent cases before the European Court of Human Rights continue to shape human rights law in Europe and have a lasting impact on the development of legal principles. Some notable recent cases include:
Case | Year | Key Issues | Impact |
Vavřička v. Czech Republic | 2021 | Mandatory vaccination policies | Clarified that mandatory vaccination policies can be compatible with the convention if they pursue a legitimate aim and respect the principle of proportionality. |
Bigsby v. United Kingdom | 2019 | Whole-life prison sentences | Concluded that whole-life sentences without the possibility of review can amount to a violation of Article 3 if there is no prospect for release based on a change in the offender and penal purposes. |
Vučinić v. Montenegro | 2018 | Domestic violence and state responsibility | Highlighted the importance of individual complaints as a mechanism for holding states accountable for failing to protect individuals from domestic violence. |
These recent cases demonstrate the evolving nature of human rights law and the European Court of Human Rights' ongoing commitment to addressing pressing and complex issues in the field.
Brexit, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (EU), has raised questions about the country's relationship with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the future of human rights protection in the UK. In this context, it is essential to understand the relationship between Brexit and ECtHR as well as the potential implications for UK law and future cooperation between the UK and the Court.
Although Brexit primarily concerns the UK leaving the EU, it is important to clarify that the European Court of Human Rights is not an EU institution. The ECtHR is established under the European Convention on Human Rights, which is part of the Council of Europe, a separate organisation from the EU. As such, Brexit does not directly affect the UK's membership in the Council of Europe or its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.
However, considering that EU law incorporates human rights standards and includes references to the European Convention on Human Rights, Brexit may have indirect implications for human rights protection in the UK.
The European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty which established the European Court of Human Rights. It is a separate entity from the European Union, meaning Brexit does not directly impact the UK's membership or obligations under the Convention.
While Brexit itself does not impact the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, there are potential implications for UK law and human rights protection that may arise after the withdrawal. Some of these implications are listed below:
Despite Brexit, the UK remains a member of the Council of Europe and continues to be bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. There are several ways in which future cooperation between the UK and the ECtHR could continue to develop:
In conclusion, while Brexit does not directly impact the UK's relationship with the European Court of Human Rights, it raises questions about the future of human rights protection in the UK. These concerns can be addressed by maintaining the UK's commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights and seeking new avenues for cooperation with the ECtHR and other Council of Europe Member States.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is a supranational court established in 1959, located in Strasbourg, France. Its primary purpose is to hear applications alleging violations of the civil and political rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights. Individuals, groups or organisations, and states can bring cases to the Court. The ECHR serves as the highest court for matters concerning human rights for the 47 member states of the Council of Europe.
Yes, the UK is a part of the European Court of Human Rights. As a member of the Council of Europe, the UK is a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, which established the court. The court's jurisdiction includes the UK and its rulings are applicable to the country.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is controlled by the Council of Europe, an international organisation comprising 47 member states. Its primary function is to protect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in Europe. The ECHR's judges are elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, ensuring an independent and impartial body that enforces the European Convention on Human Rights.
The ECJ (European Court of Justice) is the highest court in the European Union, responsible for ensuring EU law is applied and interpreted consistently across all member states. Its primary focus is on disputes involving EU law and institutions. On the other hand, the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights) is a supranational court created by the Council of Europe, and its main function is to hear applications alleging violations of the civil and political rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECHR oversees the human rights of individuals within Council of Europe member states, which includes some non-EU countries.
The ECHR is controversial due to several reasons: some critics argue that it undermines the sovereignty of individual countries, as it can override national laws and decisions, leading to concerns about undemocratic interference. There are also debates about its interpretation of the convention, for example in relation to prisoner's voting rights and terror suspects' rights. Furthermore, its backlog of cases and lengthy processing times have been criticised for inefficiency and denial of timely justice. Lastly, some believe that the court strays into areas of social policy rather than focusing solely on human rights protection.
What is the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and its main purpose?
The ECtHR is an international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights, which hears applications related to alleged violations of civil and political rights set forth in the convention by states parties. Its main purpose is to protect individual rights and promote democratic and rule of law systems across European nations.
What are the two types of applications that can be brought before the European Court of Human Rights?
Applications can be brought either by individuals, groups, or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) claiming to be victims of an alleged human rights violation, or by a High Contracting Party alleging that another High Contracting Party violated the convention.
What are the requirements for a case to be admissible before the European Court of Human Rights?
The requirements include exhaustion of domestic remedies, a time limit of six months from the final domestic decision, victim status, alleged violation of a right or freedom protected by the convention and its protocols, non-anonymous application, and not being substantially the same as another matter previously examined by the ECtHR or another international investigation or settlement procedure.
What is the procedure for submitting a case to the European Court of Human Rights?
The procedure includes completing and submitting an application form, receiving an acknowledgment of receipt from the ECtHR Registry, having the court decide on admissibility (with possible public hearings), communicating the application to the responding state's government if admissible, and finally, the court delivering a judgement on the case's merits, which is binding on the parties.
How are the judges of the European Court of Human Rights selected and what is the length of their term?
Each Member State presents a list of three candidates, ensuring a fair balance between gender and qualifications. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe elects a judge from that list. Judges are elected for a non-renewable term of nine years, with a retirement age of 70.
What principle did the Golder v. United Kingdom (1975) case establish related to the right to a fair trial?
It established that an individual has a right to access a court and legal representation to protect their civil rights and obligations, even while in prison.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in