StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
Your level of moral reasoning may impact how you assess certain situations. If society deems something as abhorrent, and you grew up in this society, your morality is likely shaped around what they deem is right or wrong, and you too shall view the act as abhorrent.
Piaget provided a set of stages a child goes through during cognitive development, and Kohlberg expanded on that, suggesting moral reasoning also progresses in stages. Kohlberg's stages apply from childhood until adulthood.
Hands below a scale, flaticon.com/freepik
Kohlberg suggested there are three levels of moral development. Each level has two of its own ‘stages’ within it, which expands on the areas of moral understanding the person is going through or has reached. So, we can say that Kohlberg has six stages of moral development overall.
Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development, Tyler Smith, StudySmarter Originals
These levels are:
The best way to remember this is by looking at the prefixes - so, pre means before, and post means after. So pre-conventional is first, conventional is second (as there’s no prefix), and post-conventional is last.
As we mentioned above, each level has its own stages within it, which we will expand upon later.
Kohlberg developed this idea from his study (based on Piaget's initial theories), where he used a sample of 75 American children, specifically, boys aged between 10 and 16. He also collected data from boys from Britain, Mexico, Turkey, Canada and Taiwan.
Something worth noting here is that the age of criminal responsibility in England is 10. If, at the age of 10, we are expecting children to know the difference between right and wrong, enough so to be punished by the law based on this, then our understanding of moral development must be sound.
It was a cross-cultural, longitudinal study, occurring over a period of 12 years (they were interviewed every three years up until they were 22 and 28) where the boys were given ten moral dilemmas in the form of stories. These dilemmas varied and were used to engage the boys in philosophical debates, asking them to think about their morals and how they would approach the situation.
A famous example of one of the stories is the Heinz dilemma.
In the Heinz dilemma, Heinz needs money to help pay for the treatment of his dying wife. She was recently diagnosed with a disease and has a month to live, and a special drug had been developed that could help treat her. Without it, she will die.
The pharmacy told them it would cost a lot of money and weren’t willing to reduce it, and no bank was willing to provide a loan. Friends and family members were only able to chip in a small amount, and it became clear that Heinz would not be able to get the money for the treatment drug.
Heinz then decided to break into the pharmacy and steal the drug.
Kohlberg would then ask the boys in an interview if Heinz was right or wrong in stealing the drug (so the data is qualitative), framing the question differently. He asked if Heinz was justified in his decision or if Heinz should be punished for it. Alternatively, should the pharmacist be punished for willingly letting a woman die and refusing to give medication that could save her life?
The answers were more than just a ‘yes’ or ‘no’. Kohlberg was interested in the moral reasoning behind their decisions.
A syringe and bottle of pills, flaticon.com/max.icons
From this, Kohlberg developed his stages of moral development.
Usually, children aged 4 to 10 revolve around this level, and moral reasoning is based on the following two stages:
1. Punishment and obedience orientation - an act is wrong because the person who did it was punished. To avoid punishment is the goal here.
2. Self-interest - an act that gets the best outcome for you is the right choice. If you do it you may be rewarded.
At this level, moral reasoning is based on the next two stages:
3. Good boy/girl orientation - an act that causes others to think positively of you is the right choice. You may receive praise for doing it, and will be known as someone who is nice/good.
4. Authority orientation - an act is right or wrong according to the rules or the law.
For example, stealing something from a store. This is based on more than just the fear of punishment, it’s because it’s against the law that you don’t do it, regardless of punishment.
At this level, moral reasoning is based on the final two stages:
5. Social contract orientation - an act is right because it creates the greatest amount of good for the most number of people. Laws are still important, but ethical values become factors in moral dilemmas, and laws can and should be changed if necessary.
6. Conscience and ethical principle orientation - an act is now governed by abstract, universal concepts and justice, equality and human life are the most important things. Judgements are made on an individual basis, and laws should be more of a guideline that can be subverted when necessary.
If we were to apply the sixth stage ‘conscience and ethical principle orientation’ to Heinz's dilemma, would it be the correct choice for Heinz to steal the medication for his wife? Is it morally justified?
Interestingly, in his study, he found that children of different cultures all pass through the same stages; however, they do so at different rates.
Conclusion
People go through the stages of moral development one by one in a fixed order. The order of the stages is universal for all cultures. Middle-class children progress through the stages faster compared to working-class children. The stages are not affected by religious beliefs.
Not many people manage to reach stages five and six in this model, and most land somewhere in the conventional reasoning stage.
Level | Stage | Stage Meaning |
1 - Preconventional (ages 4 - 10) | 1. Punishment and obedience orientation | An act is wrong because the person who did it was punished. To avoid punishment is the goal here. |
2. Self-interest | An act that gets the best outcome for you is the right choice. If you do it you may be rewarded. | |
2 - Conventional (older children, adolescents, some adults) | 3. Good boy/girl orientation | An act that causes others to think positively of you is the right choice. You may receive praise for doing it, and will be known as someone who is nice/good. |
4. Authority orientation - | An act is right because you’ve been told to do it by the rules or the law. For example, stealing something from a store. This is based on more than just the fear of punishment, it’s because it’s against the law that you don’t do it, regardless of punishment. | |
3- Postconventional (few adults, rarely children) | 5. Social contract orientation | An act is right because it creates the greatest amount of good for the most number of people. Laws are still important, but ethical values become factors in moral dilemmas, and laws can and should be changed if necessary. |
6. Conscience and ethical principle orientation | An act is now governed by abstract, universal concepts and justice, equality and human life are the most important things. Judgements are made on an individual basis, and laws should be more of a guideline that can be subverted when necessary. |
As with all studies, we need to assess their reliability and validity.
One major issue with Kohlberg’s study is that it was gender-biased. It was performed on boys, and thus the results cannot be generalised to girls, significantly reducing the applicability and generalizability of the results! Thus, it also has issues with being androcentric.
However, when this theory is applied to criminals, it supports the idea that criminals have not gone through all the required stages of moral development, suggesting a cause behind their delinquent behaviours. Kennedy and Grubin (1992) found that convicted sex offenders tended to blame the victim for the assault, and did not have much remorse for their actions.
The model also has issues with ecological validity in that these hypothetical scenarios are just that - hypothetical. How the boys would actually respond when facing the scenarios in real life could differ. It brings into question self-reflection, and social desirability bias is a real concern here. The boys may have answered in a way that makes them appear more morally correct to the researcher.
The six stages of Kohlberg’s moral development are punishment and obedience orientation, self-interest, good boy/girl orientation, authority orientation, social construct orientation, and finally conscience and ethical principles orientation.
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development is based around the idea that moral reasoning occurs in stages, and expands on Piaget’s theory of cognitive development in children. It applies from childhood until adulthood.
Kohlberg performed a cross-cultural, longitudinal study over the course of 12 years on boys aged between 10 and 16 years old. They were told ten stories involving moral dilemmas and asked questions in an interview about their moral reasoning. This allowed Kohlberg to assess the trend of moral development in these boys over the years, and he created his stages of moral development.
Kohlberg’s conventional stage involves the good boy/girl orientation, where actions are perceived as right as they shine a positive light on you, and authority orientation, where actions are perceived as right or wrong as they are deemed so by the law/rules.
Kohlberg used a storytelling technique in a cross-cultural, longitudinal study on boys aged between 10 and 16 to assess their moral reasoning levels.
of the users don't pass the Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development quiz! Will you pass the quiz?
Start QuizBe perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.