Essentially, peer review is when someone critiques research. Think about when you're completing an assignment; you may ask someone knowledgeable in the field, e.g. a class friend, to give you some constructive feedback. If this process were to be standardised, then this essentially would be the peer review process in psychology.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenEssentially, peer review is when someone critiques research. Think about when you're completing an assignment; you may ask someone knowledgeable in the field, e.g. a class friend, to give you some constructive feedback. If this process were to be standardised, then this essentially would be the peer review process in psychology.
Psychology is an essential discipline as it not only aims to improve quality of life, but it also has economic applications. These critical applications of the research are why the peer review process is needed.
After forming a hypothesis, experimenting, collecting the data and writing the report, a scientist needs an independent professional to check their report before it can be published.
Peer review is the process by which an independent professional, i.e. an expert in the field, checks a researcher's study and their written scientific report.
Without peer reviews, a scientist could submit a paper for publishing without another person checking their work and ensuring it's free of biases and errors.
Although, it's important to remember that peer reviewers are human, too, so sometimes inaccuracies or mistakes are found!
In psychology, before a study is published, it is peer-reviewed because:
Students, colleagues, and professionals can give peer reviews to evaluate various works. This type of review is not just for scientists.
You may have checked your friend's work before they submitted it to school. Similarly, they may have looked into yours. These are both examples of peer review.
When we think of psychology, its topic can be sensitive and commonly research issues such as mental health but broader societal issues. These are all essential topics. Imagine if incorrect information or wild claims without evidence are published. It could build on stereotypes, cause more societal problems or negatively impact someone's quality of life.
Therefore, the peer review process in psychology ensures that the research is done using a systematic and standardised procedure. The peer review increases the likelihood of published psychology research to be:
As with all scientific processes, peer reviews also use a systematic approach to ensure the process is reliable and accurate. The process helps keep the scientists on track and consistent across their fields of study.
The blind process in research is also often used in the peer review process.
A single-blind process is when the author's identity is not kept anonymous from the reviewer.
A double-blind peer review process is when the researcher and reviewer are unaware of each other's identity, and its goal is to prevent bias.
As you can probably guess, the double-blind peer review process is desirable as it is more likely to hinder chances of bias than the single-blind process.
The implications of psychological research on the economy refer to the evidence, and its understanding of psychological research has influenced the economy.
Since we have learned more about how mental health can affect the quality of life of individuals, it has led to the NHS receiving more funding for their psychiatry and mental health divisions.
Policymakers can use information from studies to form decisions about further actions in the economy. False study evaluations could contribute to forming wrong decisions.
For example, an incorrect judgment on unemployment rates may lead to societal changes in how benefits are processed, the amount of minimum wage, and health care ripple effects. It may also lead to public outcry.
Studies on mental health and its impact on society are becoming increasingly important, especially with rising mental health concerns.
Decisions made from studies may be biased or conflict with the views of others. Based on study results, you could decide to invest in more expensive healthcare interventions in one area and take funding away from another.
Also, there may be conflicts about where funding for studies should be allocated depending on various economic issues.
Statistics have revealed a growing mental health crisis within western societies. The reason for this is still unknown; some argue that growing awareness of such issues improves and increases diagnosis rates. On the other hand, others blame the unrealistic demands of society.
We know that people suffering from mental illnesses directly impact society.
If a person has depression, they are more likely to take time off work, directly impacting the economy.
Psychology research and treatment plans aid the economy as it helps the person recover from depression and return to work. The increased availability of cognitive behavioural therapy and drugs such as SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) has led to the development of pharmaceutical companies. However, it has led to increased demand for the NHS.
Research has developed methods of treating mental health issues, which benefits the economy.
Peer review: psychology increases the chances that published research is of high quality, empirical, objective, reliable and valid.
The Review of Economic Studies is peer-reviewed, like most other research.
Peer review may check for validity and reliability within the research, improving both. If flaws are detected, the peer reviewer may suggest changes. In some cases, researchers may need to alter aspects of their research study to address the issues seen.
An example of how psychology research has impacted society economically is since we have learned more about how mental health can affect the quality of life of individuals, it has led to the NHS receiving more funding for their psychiatry and mental health divisions.
Psychological research has led to increased and decreased societal financial burdens.
Peer reviews ensure that quality standards, such as content, structure, and grammar have been met. True or false?
True.
The author of the article carries out peer review. True or false?
False. The author writes the article, and then the peer-reviewer reviews the report. The peer-reviewer is typically an expert in the field with the knowledge and ability to check the paper.
The Review of Economic Studies is peer-reviewed. True or false?
True. The Review of Economic Studies remains one of the core economic journals, providing reliable and credible sources of information which have been peer-reviewed before being published.
For the Review of Economic Studies, how many papers were rejected on average in the past five years?
29% - 32%
For the Review of Economic studies, the average time taken to review in the past five years averaged at …….. days.
126
Q. Which of the following statements is true? Peer reviews are used to help: • Ensure that the quality of research meets publishing standards. • Check for flaws in the research design, including the reliability and validity issues surrounding the research conducted. • Ensure that the research meets high-standards and can be classified as scientific evidence.
• All of the above.
A. All of the above.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in