We all have a friend or a relative that is always late. Imagine you are planning to meet them this week. You've known them for so long that you are sure they will be at least one hour late. Would you still come to meet them at the agreed time? If you were to maximize your personal benefit, you would probably use this time to do something productive. Time is precious, so why waste it? It turns out that when firms compete in an oligopoly, a similar model of behavior known as the Cournot model of duopoly applies. Firms also want to put their resources to use in the best way given the other party's action! Interested in understanding this model? Then chop chop and read on to find out more about assumptions, characteristics and differences between Cournot and Bertrand model. And don't worry, we also have a Cournot Model example for you!
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenWe all have a friend or a relative that is always late. Imagine you are planning to meet them this week. You've known them for so long that you are sure they will be at least one hour late. Would you still come to meet them at the agreed time? If you were to maximize your personal benefit, you would probably use this time to do something productive. Time is precious, so why waste it? It turns out that when firms compete in an oligopoly, a similar model of behavior known as the Cournot model of duopoly applies. Firms also want to put their resources to use in the best way given the other party's action! Interested in understanding this model? Then chop chop and read on to find out more about assumptions, characteristics and differences between Cournot and Bertrand model. And don't worry, we also have a Cournot Model example for you!
Cournot's model is a model of oligopoly where firms producing identical products compete in quantities. It is a static one-period model used to describe the behavior of firms in an oligopoly. In Cournot model, firms independently decide on their output levels without considering any adjustments or dynamics over time.
That doesn't look so intimidating, does it? Let's then take a look at some of the model's assumptions.
Augustin Cournot came up with the model of oligopoly in 1838!
Let's go over the assumptions in the Cournot model!
Keep these at the back of your head, as everything will become more apparent in the next section, where we will look at the model mathematically!
Cournot's model in economics is a model of oligopoly where firms produce homogeneous products and compete in quantities.
Let's look at the Cournot model of a duopoly in terms of some mathematical equations and graphs!As economists love to have fun, let's give our firms names: 'The Happy Firm' and 'The Lucky Firm.'We assume that the products that the firms produce are homogeneous. The two firms will decide to set their quantities simultaneously. Each firm will first consider what its competitor would do and then set its own output to maximize its profits.The Happy Firm is thinking about how to tackle this challenge and decides to create a schedule of all the possible quantities that the Lucky Firm could produce.The Happy Firm had plotted a line representing how much output it should produce given the Lucky Firm's decision. This function is called Happy Firm's reaction function in a duopoly.
The reaction function, or the reaction curve, depicts the relationship between the quantity the firm should produce to maximize profit and the amount it presumes the other firm will make.
Imagine that the Lucky Firm goes through the same exercise and finds its reaction function. We can now plot these two reaction functions on one graph, as shown in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1 above shows the two reaction functions; one for the Happy Firm and one for the Lucky Firm. The two curves have the same form because the two firms in our example are the same. The reaction curves look different because they show one firm's profit-maximizing output given the other firm's output. Where the two reaction functions intersect is known as Cournot equilibrium. Why is this an equilibrium?Think about it more generally from the Nash equilibrium point of view. It is an equilibrium because, at this point, no firm has an incentive to deviate from its strategy. Or in other words, each firm is doing the best it possibly can considering what the other firm is doing.
Cournot equilibrium is an equilibrium in a duopoly where each firm sets its output quantities, having correctly anticipated the amount that its competitor chooses to produce.
Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium in which no firm has an incentive to deviate from its strategy. Each firm exercises its most profitable strategy, given its competitor's choice.
Suppose the firms initially start producing quantities that differ from the Cournot equilibrium. In that case, the model cannot predict any of the dynamics of quantity adjustments, which is the limitation of this model.
Let's look at an example of a Cournot model with equations and graphs!
Let's revisit our Happy Firm and Lucky Firm. Imagine the market demand curve is:\(P=300-Q=300-(Q_1+Q_2)\)
Where:\(Q=Q_1+Q_2\)\(Q_1 - \hbox{the production of the Happy Firm}\)\(Q_2 - \hbox{the production of the Lucky Firm}\)\(Q - \hbox{the total production of both firms}\)Let's set the marginal costs to zero for simplicity:\(MC_1=MC_2=0\)
How can we find the reaction function of the Happy Firm?Remember the profit-maximizing rule:\(MC=MR\)
We need to find the total revenue of the Happy Firm:
\(TR_1=P\times Q_1=(300-Q)\times Q_1=\)\(=300Q_1-(Q_1+Q_2)Q_1=\)\(=300Q_1-Q_1^2-Q_2Q_1\)Marginal revenue is then the first derivative with respect to Q1:
\(MR_1=\frac{\Delta TR_1}{\Delta Q_1}=300-2Q_1-Q_2\)
We know that:
\(MC_1=0\)
For the profit-maximizing rule to hold:\(MC_1=MR_1=0\)\(MR_1=300-2Q_1-Q_2=0\)
Rearrange to find Q1:\(2Q_1=300-Q_2\)\(Q_1=150-\frac{1}{2}Q_2\) (1)We found the reaction function for the Happy Firm!
We don't need to go over all these calculations for the Lucky Firm as we know that its reaction function is symmetric and is:
\(Q_2=150-\frac{1}{2}Q_1\) (2)
We know that the Cournot equilibrium occurs when the two functions intersect. We can then plug the value of Q2 into the equation for Q1 (1) to get:
\(Q_1=150-\frac{1}{2}\times(150-\frac{1}{2}Q_1)\)\(Q_1=150-75+\frac{1}{4}Q_1\)
\(\frac{3}{4}Q_1=75\)
\(Q_1=100\)
We have found Q1! Now we can plug the value of Q1 into (2):
\(Q_2=150-\frac{1}{2}Q_1=150-\frac{100}{2}=100\)
We have now found Q2 as well!
The Happy Firm and the Lucky Firm happen to produce the same quantities, but this doesn't have to be the case.
The total quantity produced in the market is:
\(Q=Q_1+Q_2=100+100=200\)
We can now find the equilibrium market price from the original demand equation:
\(P=300-Q=300-200=100\)
This means that each of the two firms earns a profit equivalent to their total revenue, as the marginal costs are zero:
\(\pi_1=\pi_2=TR_1=TR_2=(300-Q)\times Q_i=(300-200)\times 100=10,000\)
We can now plot our Cournot equilibrium on a diagram! Take a look at Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 shows a Cournot equilibrium for the duopoly consisting of the Happy and Lucky firms. Note that this equilibrium occurs at the intersection of the two reaction functions. The reaction function of each firm represents its output given its competitor's output.
Let's imagine for a moment that the two firms decided to collude. How would the Cournot equilibrium look, then? It would be rational for the Happy Firm and the Lucky Firm to maximize their total profits and then split those however they agree.
Collusion occurs when two or more firms cooperate to fix either prices or outputs for mutual advantages, such as higher profits.
Recall the market demand equation:
\(P=300-Q\)
The total combined revenue for the two firms is then:
\(TR=P \times Q=(300-Q) \times Q =300Q-Q^2\)
Let's find the marginal revenue of the joint production:
\(MR=\frac{\Delta TR}{\Delta Q}=300-2Q\)
Setting MR equal to zero and solving for Q yields:
\(Q=150\)
Now the two firms can produce whatever quantities they want. Still, to jointly profit-maximize, they need the total quantities to add up to 150.
The Happy Firm and the Lucky Firm owners are friends, so they decide to split the profit evenly. Therefore, they produce the same quantities:
\(Q_1=Q_2=75\)
What is interesting to see is something called a collision curve. A collision curve would show all the possible output combinations that the firms can produce. These outputs would inevitably add up to 150 and thus maximize joint profits.
The equation of the collusion curve is:
\(Q_1=Q_2=75\)
Take a look at Figure 3 below for a visualization.
Figure 3 shows the collusion curve in yellow, which has some very important insights. Without cooperation, firms can make less profit and have to produce higher output. With cooperation, they can restrict their joint output and enjoy higher profits.
The amount of profit that the firms were making jointly before cooperation was:
\(\pi_1+\pi_2=10,000+10,000=20,000\)
By colluding, they can enjoy higher profits of:
\(\pi_1+\pi_2=P \times Q = (300-150) \times 150 = 22,500\)
A collusion curve shows all the possible output combinations the colluding firms can produce to maximize joint profits.
What is the difference between the Cournot model vs. the Bertrand model? The main difference is that in the Cournot model, firms compete in quantities. In contrast, in the Bertrand model, firms compete in prices. This has a few significant implications.
Cournot saw a colluding duopoly acting akin to a monopoly in terms of price and quantity setting. In contrast, Bertrand saw price competition in a duopoly leading to a similar outcome as in the perfect competition.
A Cournot equilibrium is stable, and there is no incentive for the two firms to engage in price wars. However, in the Bertrand model, firms are likely to go through a price war, bidding down prices to their marginal costs until no firm has an incentive to deviate. That is, raising the price either above or lowering it below the marginal cost would be worse for the firm. This is an outcome that similarly occurs in the perfect competition model.
Have you read up to this point? You are a true knowledge seeker!
Check out our articles that might satisfy your hunger for learning:
- Duopoly
- Oligopolistic Market
- Game theory
- Bertrand Competition
The Cournot model in economics is a model of oligopoly where firms producing homogeneous products compete in quantities.
Augustin Cournot came up with the model of oligopoly in 1838.
There are several assumptions in Cournot's model:
The difference between Cournot and Bertrand models is that in the Cournot model, firms compete in quantities. In contrast, in the Bertrand model, firms compete in prices.
Cournot model has several characteristics:
What is the Cournot model in economics?
The Cournot model in economics is a model of oligopoly where firms produce homogeneous products and compete in quantities.
What is a reaction function in a duopoly model?
The reaction function depicts the relationship between the quantity the firm should produce to maximize profit and the amount it presumes the other firm will make.
What is the Cournot equilibrium?
Cournot equilibrium is an equilibrium in a duopoly where firms set their output quantities, having correctly anticipated the amount that their competitor chooses to produce.
What is a Nash equilibrium?
Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium in which no firm has an incentive to deviate from its strategy. Each firm exercises its most profitable strategy, given its competitor's choice.
Define collusion.
Collusion occurs when two or more firms cooperate to fix either prices or outputs for mutual advantages, such as higher profits.
What does a collusion curve show?
A collusion curve shows all the possible output combinations the colluding firms can produce to maximize joint profits.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in