Howard Becker

That’s how it happened for now 94-year-old Howard Becker. Let us look at his life’s work in the field of music, sociology of art, and sociology of deviance.

• We will start by introducing Howard Becker's life and career.
• Then we will look at his contributions to sociology and his publications.
• We will discuss his views on deviance and his labelling theory.
• We will consider how labelling theory was adapted by scholars of the sociology of media and the sociology of education.
• Finally, we will include some criticisms of Becker’s labelling theory.

Howard Saul Becker - Howie, as he prefers - was born in 1928, in Chicago.

He started playing the piano at a very early age, and music became an essential part of his life. At the age of 12, he started playing in bars and strip joints in Chicago as a jazz pianist. He later recalled that this was only possible due to WWII, as most adult musicians were drafted.

He initially wanted to become a professional pianist, and although he attended the University of Chicago, he thought of his sociology studies there as a kind of ‘pastime’. Becker continued playing music at entertainment venues and in the campus band, which was his main activity at the time.

Playing in bars, observing and experiencing marijuana use turned his attention towards social questions a bit more. He went on to properly study the phenomenon and write his thesis about it. In the end, he became more serious about sociology and gained his PhD from the University of Chicago in 1951, at the age of 23.

He was studying with Everett C. Hughes (who was a mentor to Becker), Georg Simmel and Robert E. Park. He was also friends and colleagues with Erving Goffman. All of the above and Becker were later referred to as the Chicago School of Sociology.

Becker taught at Northwestern University most of the time, but was also a visiting scholar in Europe and all around the US.

During his academic career, Becker has received scholarships from prestigious foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation and the MacArthur Foundation. He has also received no less than six honorary degrees. The American Sociological Association awarded him with the prize for the Career of Distinguished Scholarship in 1998.

As he spent most of his time at university or in jazz bars, playing the piano, he was mainly exposed to the societies and cultures that existed in these places. He turned his academic interest toward the people that frequented these places; looked at their lifestyles, habits, and ways of behaving and made sociological conclusions and theories from that observation.

Within his early work, he researched dance musicians, marijuana users and his students at university. He later created the influential labelling theory, initially used in studies of deviance but later also adapted to the media and education.

Howard Becker now lives between San Francisco, California and Paris, where he is a well-known scholar. He continues to write, play and record music.

Howard Becker created the influential labelling theory.

Becker has been a very active researcher and writer. He has published more than 200 items, 13 of which were books. He has been popular among students and fellow sociologists due to the engaging and readable style of his writing. This made his work accessible not only to scholars but to the wider public.

His accessible writing style was a conscious choice. He also wrote about the significance of good writing in the spreading of sociological research. Three of his books address this topic and serve as writing guides:

Three of his other influential books are:

Howard Becker is often considered a symbolic interactionist sociologist. Although he rejects this association, his labelling theory of deviance became the lead theory of the interactionist perspective on crime and deviance.

Interactionists argue that certain acts are labelled as criminal by the majority, and that is how deviance is socially constructed. Acts are not inherently deviant.

Becker started to research deviance from a sociological perspective when he was exposed to marijuana at the jazz bars. He realised that there was a whole culture around marijuana smoking; it was not an individual, independent act that one could look at in isolation. His work later established an analytical focus on social structures and relations that allowed him and his followers to understand which social forces were at play in producing deviance.

Master status

Becker argued that the deviant label can become a ‘master status’ in a person’s identity, overbearing all other identities. This process happens through five stages:

Influence of labelling theory

Labelling theory, when it first emerged, became very popular among sociologists because it created a new perspective on the study of crime. Instead of focusing on the offender, and why they commit crimes, it discussed how agencies of social control label act as deviant and how the whole process of labelling impacts society.

Labelling theory was applied to areas of sociological research other than crime and deviance. It was adapted to the sociology of media and also to the sociology of education.

We can apply labelling theory to the process of media representation of certain social groups. For example, Becker argued that the deviance of youth subcultures has been systematically exaggerated by the mainstream media, creating a ‘moral panic’ in society about youth subcultures.

Pressured by the public, authorities attempt to restrain these subcultures, which results in them becoming even more deviant, according to interactionist sociologists.

According to interactionists, the mass media exaggerated the deviance of certain social groups, thus creating moral panic in the general public.

Labelling theory is also used in the sociology of education for explaining differences in educational achievement of pupils.

Becker (1970) argued that there is an ‘ideal pupil’ that teachers like and positively encourage. This ideal pupil is usually middle-class, well-behaving, respectful and ready to submit to the values and rules of the school. Intelligence plays only a little role in who gets to be labelled as an ideal pupil - according to research, middle-class students are labelled more positively than working-class pupils of the same intelligence level.

Becker’s research also showed that pupils who are positively labelled by teachers show more academic development, while pupils labelled as bad students show a decline in their academic achievements. Pupils seen as unintelligent and misbehaving internalise this and eventually live up to the label. This is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. You can read more about this in our explanation on Teacher-Student Labelling.