We all know that ethnic background can affect many parts of our lives, from our social positions to our family structures. Have you ever wondered how ethnicity can specifically shape educational outcomes?
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenWe all know that ethnic background can affect many parts of our lives, from our social positions to our family structures. Have you ever wondered how ethnicity can specifically shape educational outcomes?
Research has shown that IQ and inherited ability are not major contributing factors to a student's academic performance – rather, their social, economic, and cultural backgrounds may be more important.
As much as we may like it to be otherwise, education and educational outcomes are affected by factors such as ethnicity. A pupil's ethnic background can, at least to some extent, determine their degree of success in school. This is especially the case if they come from an ethnic minority group that faces inequality in society.
Sociologists are interested in studying why this is the case. Let's take a look at how ethnicity can impact education.
Official statistics and data show that educational achievement is at least somewhat correlated to one's ethnic identity. Pupils from certain ethnic backgrounds underperform in assessments such as exams, while those from other ethnicities overperform.
This does not mean that some ethnic groups are inherently smarter or more capable – it means that some pupils do not get to achieve their full academic potential, simply because of their ethnicity.
Let's look at some governmental statistics of the GCSE results of pupils in England for the 2020-21 academic year:
The national average Attainment 8 score (a student's average score across 8 GCSE results) was 50.9 out of 90
The highest Attainment 8 scores were obtained by Chinese pupils (69.2)
Asian groups each achieved around or higher than the national average, scoring 55.8 collectively
Black pupils collectively achieved around the national average (50) but Black Caribbean and “Black other” pupils underachieved (scoring 44 and 48.3 respectively)
Mixed and White groups both perform around the national average, but Mixed White/Black Caribbean students underperform (45), as well as Roma (22.7) and Irish Traveller (30.7) pupils
While statistical data are important sources of information, there are some problems that can arise with using such statistics that you may have noticed yourself. For instance:
Some categories used in official statistics can be too broad (or too narrow!) and difficult to understand. An example of this is that in the UK, the category of “Asian” usually refers to certain South Asian groups such as Indians, Bangladeshi, Pakistanis and “Asian others”, without specifying who the “others” are. Additionally, in other parts of the world, “Asian” may refer to East Asian groups rather than South Asians.
Using just one identity category such as ethnicity can obscure the impacts of other parts of a pupil's background and experience. For example, a student's social class or gender can also significantly shape their educational attainment.
Research has shown that other, non-biological factors may be more important in explaining why different ethnic groups succeed at different rates. In 1985, the Swann Committee, appointed by the UK government, stated that IQ scores are not a cause of differing results among ethnic minorities.
Now that we've established that educational outcomes can differ by ethnicity, and that they are not due to biological differences, let's look at how social class and culture can play a part in educational attainment.
Reid (1996) argued that a pupil's social class, both in and of itself and combined with their ethnicity, may explain differences in academic achievement. Many ethnic minority pupils may come from immigrant families, whose class position is often largely dictated by the (often working-class) occupations that were available to them when they first came to the UK.
Also, their class background, level of income, resources, etc. before they immigrated also plays a part in their current social class.
Therefore, it is clear that many of the factors that affect working-class students also impact ethnic minority students, simply because ethnic minorities may also be working-class.
Put simply, many minority students have to face the “double bind” of ethnicity as well as class on their educational achievement and outcomes.
An explanation for why some ethnic groups under perform centres around cultural differences. Pupils of non-White, non-British cultures and backgrounds may find it difficult to assimilate within academic institutions, norms, values, and behaviours that are generally overwhelmingly White and British.
A student whose family immigrated from Jamaica would be used to the education system in Jamaica and may need to adjust to the British system.
Additionally, there may be language barriers for minority students whose first language is not English. Children who were raised speaking other languages at home will most likely face disadvantages compared to those who were raised speaking English.
However, the academic success of Asian students, particularly those of Indian heritage, points to the fact that language may not be a significant obstacle. In fact, being raised bilingual or multilingual may make some children more flexible, which can aid in learning.
Differences in educational attainment have also been attributed to parental expectations and attitudes. Some sociologists suggest that the level of encouragement and/or pressure to do well in their studies pupils experience from their parents translates to their actual performance.
In this vein, it is argued that the underachievement of some ethnic minority students is partly due to the lack of parental expectations they face.
This view has been disproven several times, though:
When considering ethnicity and educational attainment, it is vital to consider the impact of the school environment.
Some sociologists have suggested that it is not the pupil's ethnicity, social class, or culture, but the type of school they attend that determines their educational outcomes.
Smith and Tomlinson (1989) studied 18 comprehensive schools and pointed out a range of factors that significantly impacted the performance of ethnic minority students, including:
the quality of teaching
the available educational resources
the commitments and policies established to create equal opportunities for all students
The researchers argued that if these factors were all sufficient, there would be no reason for ethnic minorities to underperform. In other words, ethnic minority students would attain similar results to White students if they went to high-quality schools that prioritised diversity, inclusion, and their success.
As we have discussed previously in our Educational Achievement and In-School Processes Affecting Achievement articles, the opinions and expectations of teachers can play a crucial role in students' academic performance.
Particularly, teacher labelling – when a teacher labels a student positively or negatively based on pre-conceived notions about them and their behaviour – can create a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is when, after having a label applied to them, the person actually begins to conform to the label.
On the first day of class, a teacher sees a tall, "tough" looking student, who they label as a "delinquent" based on the student's image, even though he is perfectly well-behaved.
The student is then treated as a delinquent, and it is assumed that he has no interest in his education and wants to start trouble.
He gets less attention and encouragement from teachers, and is treated suspiciously and punished often. Fed up, the student loses faith and decides to start actually acting like a delinquent, since he is being treated as such anyway.
Sociologists argue that labels like that of a "delinquent" can often be influenced by stereotypes and bias based on the student's ethnicity, social class and gender. This means that certain ethnic groups, classes, and genders are more likely to be negatively labelled, leading to them underperforming.
For instance, studies show that some teachers believe that African-Caribbean boys are less academically inclined. They have lower expectations of these pupils and therefore devote less time to them.
Conversely, due to cultural stereotypes of Asians as being more studious and passive, teachers may have higher expectations of Asian pupils, labelling them "good" students.
It is also important to note that, while ethnic stereotypes may indeed impact academic performance, other identity factors can also come into play.
Mirza (1997) found that African-Caribbean girls are very motivated to succeed in education, which perhaps help combat negative labels given to African-Caribbean boys and students of all genders.
Within schools, we do not just have the official curriculum of subjects and topics to be taught. There is also the hidden curriculum, which refers to the unacknowledged cultural biases and leanings of the education system that may show up in textbooks, terminology and attitudes to certain topics. The hidden curriculum can affect a student's self-image or sense of belonging, thereby affecting their participation or performance in school.
For instance, subjects such as history may be taught through an exclusively White, British, or European lens, e.g. events such as European colonialism may be presented positively or neutrally. Academic materials could have stereotypical depictions of ethnic minorities, or may leave them out entirely. All of this contributes to the ethnocentric curriculum.
Official statistics and data show that educational achievement is at least somewhat correlated to one's ethnic identity. Pupils from certain ethnic backgrounds under perform in assessments such as exams, while those from other ethnicities over perform.
This does not mean that some ethnic groups are inherently smarter or more capable – it means that some pupils do not get to achieve their full academic potential,simply because of their ethnicity.
Sociologists argue that ethnic minority students would attain similar results to White students if they went to high-quality schools that prioritised diversity, inclusion and their success.
Social class background, cultural differences, and parental expectations are all cultural factors that can impact a student's academic performance.
Teaching about ethnicity and education in schools could, amongst other things, help address the issue of the "hidden curriculum". This would help ethnic minority pupils feel more included and may encourage their acadmemic success.
Pupils from certain ethnic backgrounds under perform in assessments such as exams, while those from other ethnicities over perform. For example, Chinese, Asian, and White groups of pupils either achieve above or at the national average, while Black Caribbean, Roma, and Irish Traveller groups achieve below the average.
Research has shown that IQ and inherited ability are major contributing factors to a student's academic performance, rather than their social, economic, and cultural backgrounds.
False
What is the relationship between ethnicity and education in terms of achievement?
Official statistics and data show that educational achievement is at least somewhat correlated to one's ethnic identity. Pupils from certain ethnic backgrounds under perform in assessments such as exams, while those from other ethnicities over perform.
This does not mean that some ethnic groups are inherently smarter or more capable – it means that some pupils do not get to achieve their full academic potential, simply because of their ethnicity.
Provide some statistics on the educational outcomes of students of different ethnicities in the UK.
The national average Attainment 8 score (a student's average score across 8 GCSE results) was 50.9 out of 90
The highest Attainment 8 scores were obtained by Chinese pupils (69.2)
Asian groups each achieved around or higher than the national average, scoring 55.8 collectively
Black pupils collectively achieved around the national average (50) but Black Caribbean and “Black other” pupils underachieved (scoring 44 and 48.3 respectively)
Mixed and White groups both perform around the national average, but Mixed White/Black Caribbean students underperform (45), as well as Roma (22.7) and Irish Traveller (30.7) pupils
Statistical data is objective. Does this mean it has no issues in this case? Why?
While statistical data are important sources of information, there are some problems that can arise with using such statistics. For instance:
Some categories used in official statistics can be too broad (or too narrow!) and difficult to understand. An example of this is that in the UK, the category of “Asian” usually refers to certain South Asian groups such as Indians, Bangladeshi, Pakistanis, and “Asian others”, without specifying who the “others” are. Additionally, in other parts of the world, “Asian” may refer to East Asian groups rather than South Asians.
Using just one identity category such as ethnicity can obscure the impacts of other parts of a pupil's background and experience. For example, a student's social class or gender can also significantly shape their educational attainment.
Who argued that a pupil's social class, both in and of itself and combined with their ethnicity, may explain differences in academic achievement?
Reid (1996)
How can familial and social class backgrounds impact ethnic minority students?
Many ethnic minority pupils may come from immigrant families, whose class position is often largely dictated by the (often working-class) occupations that were available to them when they first came to the UK. Also, their class background, level of income, resources, etc. before they immigrated also plays a part in their current social class.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in