Americas
Europe
Content Warning - derogatory language and slurs: some readers may be sensitive to some of the content in this article about semantic reclamation. This document serves an educational purpose to inform people of important information and relevant examples of semantic reclamation. Our team is diverse, and we sought input from members of the communities mentioned to educate readers in a way that is sensitive to the history of these words.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenContent Warning - derogatory language and slurs: some readers may be sensitive to some of the content in this article about semantic reclamation. This document serves an educational purpose to inform people of important information and relevant examples of semantic reclamation. Our team is diverse, and we sought input from members of the communities mentioned to educate readers in a way that is sensitive to the history of these words.
Culture, politics, and society; these things are constantly changing. Because of this, language is constantly changing, too. What we say and how we talk reflect who we are, where we come from, and when and how we have been socialised.
Semantic reclamation is a major example of how the changes within language and society are connected. In this article, we will look at semantic reclamation in more depth, including examples and the controversies surrounding them.
Let's look at a definition of semantic reclamation:
Semantic reclamation (also known as reappropriation) is when individuals and groups use and take ownership of derogatory words that have been used to oppress them. Reclaimed words are usually political and controversial due to their present and historical use of belittling oppressed groups such as women, the LGBTQ + community, the disabled community, and ethnic minorities.
When a word is reappropriated, the disparaged group adapts the context in which the slur is used, making it more difficult for oppressors to use it against them. Those within marginalized groups who support semantic reclamation argue that by redefining slurs and using them in their own context, the oppressive power of the words is reduced as they no longer have the same negative connotations in the oppressed community (within reason).
As society progresses, often due to hard political struggle, our values change. Because of this, some oppressed groups have become increasingly liberated, although we still have a long way to go in many respects. The meanings of words can also shift to reflect these changing societal views.
Similarly to language Narrowing, language Broadening, Pejoration, and Amelioration, semantic reclamation is a significant example of how developments in society and language are connected.
Some synonyms of semantic reclamation include language reappropriation, lexical shift, and language repossession.
As society progresses, our language naturally reflects this. However, as we will see in the following examples, changes such as semantic reclamation can be controversial and political.
Although reclaimed slurs may be used by individuals from the communities they describe, it is still not okay to use them if you are not part of this community. These words are still highly offensive when used in the wrong context by the wrong person. Furthermore, not all individuals from specific communities agree with the reclamation of pejorative language.
What's with the asterix? In professional documents, potentially offensive words are often censored to ensure the text remains inoffensive and professional by avoiding the use of strong language.
B * tch
'B * tch has been used as a derogatory term throughout history, usually towards women. As the formal meaning of the word is 'female dog', the term developed into an insult against women by likening them to dogs.
I just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% that b * tch
Even when I'm crying crazy
Yeah, I got boy problems, that's the human in me
Bling bling, then I solve 'em, that's the goddess in me
You coulda had a bad b * tch, non-committal
Sl * t
'Sl*t' is arguably still in the process of being reclaimed by women worldwide. The original meaning of 'sl*t' implied low standards and low personal hygiene. This meaning has developed over time to describe women who have had a lot of sexual partners as women with low standards of living.
D * ke
Since the late 1970s, lesbians have worked to reclaim the words 'd*ke, 'butch', and 'femme' (and the roles associated with them).
The word 'd*ke' describes a masculine-presenting woman or butch lesbian and is a shortened form of 'bulld*ke' (considered more offensive). It was an intense pejorative used in the 1950s and 1960s as a result of entrenched homophobic and misogynistic values in British and American societies. The word has also been used pejoratively by upper-class lesbians to describe butch or crude lesbians. Similarly to the word 'f*ggot', 'd * ke' has also been used to identify political and feminist activists.
Queer
'Queer' has been used as an insult to describe people seen as strange or on the outskirts of society and has especially been used as a derogatory word against homosexual people. The term was first used to refer to homosexuality in 1894 by the Marquess of Queensbury.
Reclamation does not always refer to words. Statues and artwork, and other objects can also be reclaimed. Let's look at some examples.
Some artefacts stolen by colonial powers are either in the process of being or have already been reclaimed by their country of origin.
Sarah Baartman was a Southwestern African woman who was enslaved and exhibited in 19th-century freak shows in Europe. 'Hottentot' is an offensive term for Khoekoe people, and is considered a Taboo word because of its history and negative connotations. The women were commonly exhibited in freakshows because of their uncommon and curvaceous body type by European standards, and were often treated cruelly and sold as slaves.
Sarah Baartman died at 26 years old, yet her remains were examined by French anatomist Georges Cuvier for scientific inquiry before being displayed in Museum d'histoire naturelle d'Angers, France. Since the 1940s, there were many calls for the return of her remains to her birth soil. Many, such as Stephen Jay Gould, explain that her remains in a European museum emphasize the use of European pseudoscience to promote intellectual ignorance and oppression of African people.
Nelson Mandela formally requested France to return the remains in 1994, which the French National Assembly agreed to in 2002. While Sarah Baartman's Case was successful, there are many remains or bones still on display in various museums in Europe, such as the Irish Giant Charles O'Brien, which are considered part of scientific investigation.
The marbles were originally part of the Parthenon temple in Athens, and are now displayed in the British Museum. They were removed in 1801-1812 by Thomas Bruce, who claimed to be the legal owner of them. Literary figures such as Lord Byron have considered this an act of vandalism, while others considered the acquisition important to historical study. Bruce sold the collection to the British Museum in 1816, and there have been many requests by the Greek government to have them returned. As of 2021, UNESCO has called for their return.
Influenced by the Black Lives Matter protesters in America, supporters of the movement in Bristol tore down a statue of Edward Colston and pushed it into the river in the summer of 2020 after previous unsuccessful campaigns to remove the statue.
Edward Colston was a historical figure that built up the city of Bristol. He did so using slaves, which is why the protestors took down his statue as a way of demonstrating that they did not stand with Colston's values as a colonist and slave trader. Some Bristolian residents were angry that the statue got torn down as they believed Colston was an influential and admirable figure, responsible for the city's greatness. As the incident drew national attention, many were frustrated by how quickly people decided to tear it down and bury history. Some people felt it seemed an impulse decision.
As the above examples demonstrate, reclaimed words and statues are political and often controversial. Let's examine this in greater detail.
One of the main controversies involving language reclamation is that not everyone in an oppressed group shares the same values. Therefore, the reclamation of a certain slur may not be supported by all people who have been affected by its use.
Many feminists still view the word sl*t as offensive, and they do not agree that women using it amongst themselves will result in the word being reclaimed, but rather encourage more people to use it against women.
Another controversial question surrounding language reclamation is who can use the word once it has been reclaimed? When an oppressed group chooses to reclaim a word and use it amongst themselves, other people who are not part of the oppressed community may wrongly believe that they can use the word, too.
Although there are lesbians who feel comfortable using the word 'd*ke' to describe themselves, it would be highly inappropriate for a heterosexual person to refer to a lesbian (or anyone) using this slur.
Language reclamation provides insight into how our society's values have adapted and changed over time. Studying language reclamation can help us track historical movements and provide context for our language. For example:
The word 'suffragette' is a perfect example of how semantic reclamation reflects historical movements.
'Suffragette' was first used by a reporter in The Daily Mail newspaper to belittle the 'suffragists' - women who were fighting for women's right to vote.
This is because words ending in 'ette' are often used to describe small things, such as 'kitchenette' (a small kitchen) and 'pipette' (a small water-dropping device).
The suffragettes were unphased by this attempt to dishearten them, and they reclaimed the word by placing more emphasis on the 'g' sound in the word. Plosive sounds are more harsh and aggressive than other sounds like 's' and 'f' because they stop the airflow when you voice them. By placing emphasis on the 'g' in suffragette, the women demonstrated their strong will and courage.
Fig. 1 - Millicent Fawcett, leader of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS).
Reclaiming words can be an empowering experience that shows an oppressed group choosing not to be disparaged by their oppressors. By reclaiming language and creating their own rules surrounding its use, the oppressed group removes the power from their oppressor to belittle them.
Semantic reclamation can help people feel liberated - some women reclaim the word sl * t as a symbol of sexual liberation and a break away from the negative connotations surrounding sexually active women.
Semantic reclamation demonstrates how societal values are not fixed but can change -changing language and the rules surrounding language use can strengthen communities and give hope for change. However, this is not always the Case for every culture or social group, and the processes of reclaiming words or artefacts are always contentious and highly debated.
Semantic reclamation can be a source of empowerment for oppressed groups as they stand against those who have repressed them.
Semantic reclamation is a process in which an oppressed group redefines a slur and how it has been used against them, using it in their own context to empower themselves.
Words that have been reappropriated are often controversial and political as they are emotionally charged by historic events and beliefs.
It is not only words that can be reclaimed. Art such as paintings and statues can also be reappropriated, as well as other items like vintage clothes and farming tools.
As our society progresses our language also alters. Semantic reclamation is one of the ways in which our Language Changes to suit our ever-changing needs. For example, our society becomes more inclusive and our language needs to reflect this.
Reappropriated language can often be controversial due to the historic views that the words represent, and the fact that not everyone in the oppressed group will share the same opinion that the word should be reclaimed.
Semantic reclamation is a process in which an oppressed group redefines a slur and how it has been used against them by using it in their own context.
Synonyms for semantic reclamation include, language repossession, language reappropriation, and lexical change
Semantic reclamation is controversial because the words are usually emotionally or politically charged because of historic events and beliefs.
Some examples of reclaimed words include, b * tch, sl * t, queer, and d * ke.
Artefacts and statues.
YOUR SCORE
Your score:
Already have an account? Log in
SIGNUP SIGNUPFlashcards in Semantic Reclamation25
Start learningWhy do people reclaim words?
People reclaim words because it is an empowering experience as it allows an oppressed group to choose not to be disparaged by their oppressors.
How is semantic reclamation an empowering experience?
Semantic reclamation is an empowering experience because the minority removes the power from their oppressor to belittle them as they redefine how the word is used.
True or false?
Everyone is always happy when words are reclaimed because it helps society become more inclusive and accepting.
False
True or false?
Reclaimed words are often controversial.
True
True or false?
The meaning of 'sl*t' has developed over time to describe women who have had a lot of sexual partners as women with low standards of living.
True
How was the word queer initially used?
Queer was previously used as an insulting word due to the fact it referred to gay people, it became a general insult describing people that seemed strange or on the outskirts of society.
Already have an account? Log in
How would you like to learn this content?
How would you like to learn this content?
Free english cheat sheet!
Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Explanations 
Exams 
Magazine 
