Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenAs much as we rely on media in contemporary society, to what extent can we trust it? Has media improved our world, or made it risky?
Sociologists study contemporary media to understand its impact on society. We will look at:
This explanation is an overview. You can find more detailed information on each topic mentioned below in separate StudySmarter articles.
Let's go over four of the main aspects of media in sociology: the advent of new media, issues of ownership and control of the media, the globalisation of media, and processes of news selection and presentation in media.
Another crucial aspect of the sociology of media is media representations. For detailed analyses on this topic, visit our various Media Representations articles on StudySmarter.
Let's consider what new media is and how it is used in contemporary society.
New media is a term encompassing the evolution of existing media delivery systems as well as the development of new digital communication technologies.
Systems of media delivery have changed drastically in the past 30 years. This is embodied in high-definition digital TV with hundreds of channels, which has evolved from aerial, black-and-white TV with limited options for viewing.
New media marks the creation of new forms of digital communication technologies, such as personal computers, mobile phones and the internet. These have enabled new forms of communication, e.g. text messaging.
According to Ofcom, the 16–24-year-old age group use new media the most and elderly people use it the least. The majority of younger people use it for various reasons, including gaming and social networking. Older social media users heavily favour Facebook.
The middle and upper classes are more likely to use digital media technologies as they can afford them. According to some sociologists, the poor are a digital underclass that cannot keep up with the middle-class technological elite.
Men are more likely than women to use e-mail or chat rooms, play more computer games, and are reportedly more confident about their IT skills. Conversely, women spend more time on the phone and send more text messages than men.
The six major characteristics of new media are that it is:
Digital
Interactive
Hypertextual
Globally networked
Virtual, and
Simulated
We will go through some sociological perspectives on new media, outlined below.
Neophiliacs believe that new media is generally beneficial to society. This is because it gives easy and widespread access to information, allows the creation of new social networks, increases consumer choice, aids democracy, and has heralded an e-commerce revolution.
Cultural pessimists, on the other hand, argue that the positive impact of new media is exaggerated and that it can have drawbacks. These include corporate control of the internet, surveillance of consumers, declining quality of media and a lack of regulation.
We will consider who has ownership and control of the media and how this influences the media content.
Patterns of ownership and control of the media are important because:
For democracy to function, all systems of thought should be readily accessible and represented.
Any abuses of power and privilege by society's elites need to be scrutinised by free and fair media outlets.
The number of companies that own and control the mass media worldwide has shrunk considerably in recent decades. In the 1980s, 50 corporations controlled almost all news media outlets in the USA, but by the 2000s, this number decreased to just 7.1
According to Curran (2002), a select few have historically owned British newspapers. For instance, in the 1930s, nearly one in every two national and local daily newspapers sold in the UK was owned by four individuals.2 Unfortunately, the issue has been getting worse over time.
A report published by the Media Reform Coalition shows that today, just three companies dominate 90% of the UK's national newspaper market.3
There are two competing sociological perspectives on the ownership and control of media: Marxism and postmodern pluralism. Read more about them below.
Marxists argue that the ruling class largely owns mass media and uses it to reproduce and normalise capitalist ideology. This is because, by doing so, they promote capitalism and the interests of the elite. According to Marxists, the role of media institutions is to legitimise the capitalist system and condition the working class into adopting capitalist ideas.
Pluralists have a much more positive view of media ownership. They believe that media owners are usually trustworthy because media content is primarily influenced by consumer demand, not owners' interests. Media outlets are therefore only fulfilling consumers' wishes to make a profit; consumers ultimately have the final say on what gets featured.
Curran and Seaton's (2003) in-depth study of the history of the British press found that media tycoons have interfered with British news media content from the early twentieth century to more recent decades.
They argue that the postmodern pluralist view that media owners do not influence media content is empirically false, asserting that intervention by moguls such as Rupert Murdoch has actually increased since the 2000s.
However, Curran and Seaton also believe that Marxists are incorrect about owner motives. Media owners are not pushing a class agenda but rather running businesses and pursuing their own economic self-interest.
We will be looking at global media, globalisation and culture.
Freeman (2018) defines media globalisation as 'the production, distribution, and consumption of media products on a global scale, facilitating the exchange and diffusion of ideas cross-culturally'.4
Global media essentially includes all forms of mass communication that can be used and accessed worldwide - television, newspapers, radio, the internet, etc.
The most profound impact of globalisation in society has arguably been on culture. Cultural globalisation refers to the adaptation and exchange of different cultural values, ideas, attitudes and products across the globe. It has changed the nature of almost every aspect of society, including:
Migration patterns
Food and eating habits
Sports and entertainment
Consumption patterns
Global consciousness
Some of the major consequences of the globalisation of culture have been detraditionalisation and heightened risk consciousness.
Detraditionalisation is the process where people actively question their traditional value systems and social norms. This can include religious beliefs, the institution of marriage, gender roles, etc. It is a result of being exposed to different lifestyles and ways of thinking, a direct impact of globalisation.
Risk consciousness refers to the fact that, due to real-time global news updates and more access to information than ever, people globally are hyperaware of risks such as crime, terrorism, natural disasters, etc. This has both negative and positive effects as it can cause panic/paranoia but also empathy.
There are three main theoretical views on the globalisation of media.
This perspective argues that globalisation through media is a process of Americanisation - whether American culture and values are imposed on other parts of the world, diluting local cultures and traditions.
Followers of this theory consider media to be central to globalisation and focus on the positive influences of media globalisation on society, e.g. more knowledge and wider lifestyle choices.
Contrary to postmodernism, Marxists argue that globalisation restricts choice because international media corporations exercise too much control.
With so many events happening at the same time, it is not possible to broadcast everything. How do media platforms decide what 'news' is? In this topic, we will be considering how news is selected and presented in the media.
Some sociologists believe that news is socially constructed and is not an accurate way to interpret current affairs. This is because news content is shaped largely by how media professionals (such as editors and journalists) choose to select and present events, based on newsworthiness.
Newsworthiness refers to whether an event, topic or person is considered interesting or worthy enough to feature on the news. It is directly correlated to the amount of news value.
The higher the news value of a subject, the more coverage it is likely to receive in the news media. This is because high news value attracts more users/readers, which brings in more profit for the media company.
Some aspects that determine the news value of a subject are:
Impact
Timeliness
Shock value
Trendiness
Conflict/negativity
Personalisation
There are a number of organisational and bureaucratic factors that can impact the selection and presentation of news content, such as:
The financial costs of the type of reporting
The time slot allotted by the news medium
The deadline constraints
The immediacy and accuracy of the story
The target audience, and
Journalistic ethics
We live in a media-saturated society, in which the media informs much of our views and opinions and even lifestyles. Marxists argue that the content of news media primarily reflects the perspectives and interests of the rich and the middle class, excluding the opinions and affairs of ordinary working-class people.
This is because mainstream media is dominated by the views of elite owners, middle-class journalists and people in power, who all impart their own world-views and pursue their own economic interests. Therefore, news content is deeply influenced by and promotes an elite, capitalist agenda.
Working-class groups and young people are often presented in decidedly negative, sensationalised ways in news media. Middle-class journalists often stir up moral panics about these groups and their subcultures because they attract considerable public attention and reactions - they are 'newsworthy'.
Moral panics are often stirred up by the media around the topics of crime and deviance.
This can be illustrated through Cohen's 1972 study of the Mods and Rockers, two British youth subcultures. Cohen found that negative coverage by the news media exaggerating the rivalry and deviant activities of the subcultures actually caused more conflict between the groups, along with creating a moral panic about British youth.
The sociology of media provides sociological analysis on many aspects, including the advent of new media, issues of ownership and control of the media, the globalisation of media, and processes of news selection and presentation in media.
New media is a term encompassing the evolution of existing media delivery systems as well as the development of new digital communication technologies.
Studying the media is important in sociology because the media affects all aspects of society, culture, and social relations.
Yes, media is an important part of the field of sociology.
According to cultural imperialists, globalisation through media as resulted in Americanisation of culture, which dilutes local cultures and traditions. Postmodernists consider globalised media to be positive, as it results in more knowledge and wider lifestyle choices.
The criteria of relevance that guides media professionals for the selection and presentation of news content is defined as news value.
True.
What was Stan Cohen's study on the fights between Mods and Rockers focused on?
His primary focus was on the media response to that event.
Who did media present as the folk devil?
Cohen argued that the media's narrative featured the Mods and Rockers as folk devils, the target of exaggerated public outbursts and concerns.
Who are ‘primary definers’?
Elite and high-ranking professionals like government officials, academic experts, company owners, and celebrities are often invited to express their views on news items rather than those who are 'ordinary' members of society. As a result, they become the 'primary definers' of the agenda.
According to the Marxists, the content of news primarily reflects the views and interests of the lower class.
False.
Why do news companies rarely criticise the capitalist system?
News companies often depend on advertisers for revenue, so the news does not generally criticise the capitalist system - choosing to remain in its favour.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in