Case 1: The function is a constant value
This function, which meets the requirements of Rolle's Theorem, has a derivative of 0 everywhere - StudySmarter Original
Every point on the function meets the Rolle's Theorem requirements as everywhere.
Case 2: The function is not a constant value
Because the function is not a constant value, it must change direction to start and end at the same function value. So, somewhere inside the graph, the function will either have a minimum, a maximum, or both.
This function, which meets the requirements of Rolle's Theorem, has both a minimum and maximum - StudySmarter Original
We must prove that the minimum or maximum (or both) occur when the derivative equals 0.
Extrema cannot occur when because when , the function is increasing. At an extrema value, the function cannot be increasing. At a maximum point, the function cannot be increasing because we are already at the maximum value. At a minimum point, the function cannot be increasing because the function was a little smaller to the left of where we are now. Since we're at the minimum value, cannot be any smaller than it is now.
Extrema cannot occur when because when , the function is decreasing. At an extrema value, the function cannot be decreasing. At a maximum point, the function cannot be increasing because which means was larger a little to the left of where we are now. Since we're at the maximum value, cannot be any larger than it is now. At a minimum point, the function cannot be decreasing because we are already at the minimum value.
Since isn't less than 0 or greater than 0, must equal 0.