StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.

4.8 • +11k Ratings

More than 3 Million Downloads

Free

Suggested languages for you:

Americas

Europe

Put Call Parity

Explore the vital elements of Put Call Parity in Corporate Finance with this comprehensive examination. Delve into the concept, its importance in business studies, and its intricate relation to American options. You'll find an in-depth analysis of the Put Call Parity formula, its components, and its application in business finance. Adjacent to this, you'll discover how dividends integrate within Put Call Parity and their implications. Furthermore, gain an understanding of arbitrage in relation to Put Call Parity and its practical implementations throughout business studies. To ensure a holistic grasp of the subject, this guide also illustrates the usage of the Call Put Parity equation and offers real-world examples and case studies of Put Call Parity applications.

Content verified by subject matter experts

Free StudySmarter App with over 20 million students

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

- Business Case Studies
- Amazon Global Business Strategy
- Apple Change Management
- Apple Ethical Issues
- Apple Global Strategy
- Apple Marketing Strategy
- Ben and Jerrys CSR
- Bill Gates Leadership Style
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Coca-Cola Business Strategy
- Disney Pixar Merger Case Study
- Enron Scandal
- Franchise Model McDonalds
- Google Organisational Culture
- Ikea Foundation
- Ikea Transnational Strategy
- Jeff Bezos Leadership Style
- Kraft Cadbury Takeover
- Mary Barra Leadership Style
- McDonalds Organisational Structure
- Netflix Innovation Strategy
- Nike Marketing Strategy
- Nike Sweatshop Scandal
- Nivea Market Segmentation
- Nokia Change Management
- Organisation Design Case Study
- Oyo Franchise Model
- Porters Five Forces Apple
- Porters Five Forces Starbucks
- Porters Five Forces Walmart
- Pricing Strategy of Nestle Company
- Ryanair Strategic Position
- SWOT analysis of Cadbury
- Starbucks Ethical Issues
- Starbucks International Strategy
- Starbucks Marketing Strategy
- Susan Wojcicki Leadership Style
- Swot Analysis of Apple
- Tesco Organisational Structure
- Tesco SWOT Analysis
- Unilever Outsourcing
- Virgin Media O2 Merger
- Walt Disney CSR Programs
- Warren Buffett Leadership Style
- Zara Franchise Model
- Business Development
- Business Operations
- Customer Expectations
- Customer Service and ICT
- Flow Production
- Good Customer Service
- Job Production
- Just-In-Case Inventory Management
- Just-In-Time Inventory Management
- Lean Production
- Methods of Good Customer Service
- Poor Customer Service
- Procurement
- Production Process
- Quality Assurance
- Sales Process
- Stages of Sales Process
- Change Management
- Action Research
- Divorce between Ownership and Control
- Innovation Culture
- Kotter's Change Model
- Learning Organization
- Lewin's Change Model
- Managing Organisational Culture
- National Culture
- Organisation Structures
- Organizational Climate
- Organizational Culture Definition
- Organizational Development
- Resisting Change
- Strategic Implementation
- Corporate Finance
- APR
- Abandonment Option
- Accounting Rate of Return
- Adjusted Present Value
- Adjustments in WACC
- Agency Problems
- Agency problem
- Amortization
- Annuities
- Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- Asset Backed Securities
- Bank Loans
- Benefits of M&A
- Beta in Finance
- Binomial Model
- Black Scholes Formula
- Black-Scholes Model
- Bond Coupon
- Bond Duration
- Bond Returns
- Bond Terminology
- Bond Volatility
- Bonds
- Business Life Cycle
- Business Risk Analysis
- Business Valuation
- Buybacks
- CAPM Assumptions
- Calculate Compound Return
- Calculating IRR
- Call Options
- Capital Asset Pricing Model
- Capital Budget
- Capital Budgeting
- Capital Investments
- Capital Rationing
- Carve Out
- Cash Budgeting
- Cash Collection
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- Certainty Equivalent
- Common Stock
- Company Cost of Capital
- Comparables Valuation
- Compensation
- Competitive Advantage
- Components of Working Capital
- Conglomerate Merger
- Continuous Compounding
- Contracts
- Convertible Bonds
- Convertibles
- Corporate Bonds Default Risk
- Corporate Control
- Corporate Debt
- Corporate Debt Yield
- Corporate Financial Goals
- Corporate Income Tax
- Corporate Tax
- Corporation
- Cost of Bankruptcy
- Cost of Capital
- Cost of Equity
- Cost of Equity Capital
- Cost of Financial Distress
- Covenants
- Credit Decisions
- Cross Currency Swap
- Currency Risk
- DCF Model
- DCF Terminal Value
- DCF Valuation
- Debentures
- Debt Policy
- Debt Restructuring
- Debt vs Equity
- Decision Trees
- Declining Industries
- Default Risk
- Direct and Indirect Costs of Bankruptcy
- Discounted Cash Flow
- Discounted Payback Period
- Dividend Payout
- Dividend Policy
- Dividends
- DuPont Analysis
- Dual Class Equity
- EAR
- Economic Exposure
- Economic Rent
- Economic Value Added
- Efficiency Calculations
- Equity
- Exchange Rate Theories
- External Financing
- Fama French 3 Factor Model
- Financial Bubbles
- Financial Decisions
- Financial Distress
- Financial Leverage
- Financial Managers
- Financial Planning
- Financing Decision
- Flexible Production
- Flow to Equity
- Follow On Investments
- Forward Contract
- Fundamentals of Corporate Finance
- Future Value
- Future Value of Annuity
- Futures Contract
- General Cash Offer
- Global Ownership Structures
- Going Public
- Growing Annuity Formula
- Growing Perpetuity Formula
- Growth Industries
- Growth Stocks
- Hedge Ratio
- Horizontal Integration
- How to Build a Merger Model
- IRR Pitfalls
- IRR Rule
- Identifying Options
- Incentive Compensation
- Income Stocks
- Incremental Cash Flow
- Inflation Indexed Bonds
- Interest Rate Hedge
- Interest Rate Swaps
- Internal Rate of Return
- International Cash Management
- International Cost of Capital
- International Risk
- Investing
- Investment Criteria
- Investment Decisions
- Investment Opportunities
- Issuance of securities
- Law of Conservation of Value
- Law of One Price
- Lease Accounting
- Leasing
- Leverage Ratios
- Leveraged Buyout
- Leveraged Leases
- Leveraged Restructuring
- Levered Beta
- Liquidity Ratios
- Loan Covenants
- Long Term Financial Plans
- Managing Credit
- Managing Debt
- Market Capitalization
- Market Values
- Marketable Securities
- Medium Term Notes
- Merger Waves
- Merger and Acquisition Considerations
- Merger and Acquisition Costs
- Mergers
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Modern Portfolio Theory
- Modigliani-Miller Formula
- Monitoring and Evaluation
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- NPV Investment Decision Rule
- NPV Rule
- NPV vs IRR
- Net Present Value
- Nominal Interest Rate
- Operating Leases
- Optimistic Forecast
- Option Valuation
- Option to Expand
- Options
- Options Fundamentals
- Options Risk Management
- Organizational Change
- Ownership Structure
- PVGO
- Payback
- Payback Period
- Pecking Order Theory
- Performance Management
- Perpetuities
- Political Risk
- Portfolio Risk
- Portfolio Theory
- Positive NPV
- Predicting Default
- Preferred Stock
- Present Value of Annuity
- Present Value of Perpetuity
- Pricing Models
- Private Equity Partnerships
- Private Placement
- Privatization
- Problems with NPV
- Project Analysis
- Project Valuation
- Put Call Parity
- Put Options
- Pyramid Systems
- Rate of Return
- Real Interest Rate
- Real Options
- Reasons For a Merger
- Residual Income
- Restructuring
- Return on Equity
- Returns
- Rewarding Performance
- Risk
- Risk Adjusted Discount Rate
- Risk Management
- Risk Neutral Valuation
- Risk of Hedging
- Scenario Analysis
- Security Risk Assessment
- Selling Securities
- Semi-Strong Market Efficiency
- Sensitivity Analysis
- Sharpe Ratio
- Short Termism
- Sovereign Bonds
- Speculation
- Spin Off
- Spot Exchange Rate
- Spot Rate
- Statistical Models
- Stock Dividend
- Stock Issues
- Stock Prices
- Stock Valuation
- Stockholder Voting Rights
- Strong Form Efficiency
- Structural Models
- Takeover
- Tax on Dividends
- Term Structure
- Terminal Value
- Time Value of Money
- Timing Option
- Transactions
- Transparency
- Types of Agency Problems
- Types of Bonds
- Types of Debt
- Types of Depreciation
- Types of Interest Rates
- Types of Investment Funds
- Unlevered Beta
- Value Additivity Principle
- Valuing Common Stock
- Variance and Standard Deviation
- Venture Capital Market
- Weighted Average Cost of Capital
- Working capital
- Yield Spread
- Zero Coupon Bond
- Financial Performance
- Analysing Financial Performance
- Average Rate of Return
- Balance Sheet
- Break Even Analysis Chart
- Break-Even Analysis
- Cash Flow
- Cash Flow Budget
- Cash Flow Forecast
- Cash Flow Improvement
- Cashflow Problems
- External Sources of Finance
- Financial Objectives
- Financial Performance and Stakeholders
- Financial Statements
- Financial Terms and Calculations
- Income Statements
- Internal Sources of Finance
- Investments
- Profitability Ratio
- Sources of Finance
- Human Resources
- Boundary Spanning
- Contract of Employment
- Departmentalization
- Downsizing
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Costs
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Rewards
- Employee Training and Development
- Employment Policy
- Expectancy Theory
- Flexible Work Arrangements
- HR Policies
- Hackman and Oldham Model
- Herzberg Two Factor Theory
- Human Resource Flow
- Human Resource Management
- Human Resource Objectives
- Improving Employer - Employee Relations
- Incentives for Employees
- Internal and External Communication
- Intrinsic Motivation
- Job Characteristics Model
- Job Design
- Job Satisfaction
- Labour Productivity
- Labour Turnover
- Maslow Theory
- Matrix Organizational Structure
- Methods of Recruitment
- Motivating & Engaging Employees
- Motivation in the Workplace
- Organisation Design
- Organizational Justice
- Organizational Strategy
- Organizational Structure Types
- Pay Structure
- Performance Evaluation
- Performance Feedback
- Recruitment And Selection
- Reinforcement Theory
- Retention Rate
- Self-Efficacy Theory
- Taylor Motivation Theory
- Team Structure
- Termination
- Training Methods
- Work-Life Balance
- Influences on Business
- Business Ethics
- Business Risks
- Business Uncertainty
- Consumer Law
- E-commerce
- Economic Climate
- Effects of Interest Rates on Businesses
- Employment Law
- Environment and Business
- External Factors Affecting Business
- Government Policies on Business
- Health and Safety
- Inflation and Business
- Information and Communication Technology in Business
- Multinational Company
- Sustainability in Business
- Tax on Business
- Intermediate Accounting
- Account Management Responsibilities
- Account Receivable
- Accounting Assumptions
- Accounting Basics
- Accounting Changes
- Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
- Accounting Cycle
- Accounting Equations
- Accounting Errors
- Accounting Policies
- Accounting for Income Taxes
- Accounting for Investments
- Accounts Payable
- Accruals
- Accrued Liabilities
- Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
- Acquisition Valuation
- Activity Ratio
- Adjusting Entries
- Allocation Base
- Allocation Method
- Amortization of Intangible Assets
- Antidilutive
- Assets Held for Sale
- Average Cost Method
- Balance Sheet Accounts
- Bond Indenture
- Bond Valuation
- Bonds and Long-term notes
- Capitalized Cost
- Cash Dividends
- Cash Inflow
- Cash and Cash Equivalents
- Cash and Receivables
- Cash vs Accrual Accounting
- Change in Accounting Principle
- Change in Inventory Method
- Change in Reporting Entity
- Claims and Litigations
- Components of Pension Expense
- Composite Depreciation Method
- Comprehensive Income
- Conceptual Framework
- Contingencies
- Convertible Bonds Accounting
- Corporation Definition
- Correcting Entries
- Cost Allocation
- Cost Flow Methods
- Cost of Debt
- Current Liabilities
- Debt Investment
- Deferred Payment
- Deferred Tax Asset
- Deferred Tax Liability
- Defined Benefit Pension Plan
- Defined Contribution Plan
- Depreciation
- Depreciation Methods
- Direct Method Cash Flow
- Discontinued Operations
- Dispositions
- Dollar Value LIFO
- Donated Assets
- Ease of Raising Capital
- Effective Interest Method
- Elements of Cash Flow Statement
- Elements of Financial Statements
- Employee Ownership
- Enhancing Qualitative Characteristics
- Equity Investments
- Equity Issuance
- Equity Method
- Estimates
- Ethics in Accounting
- Exchange Traded Notes
- Exchanges
- Executive Compensation
- Extinguishment of Debt
- FIFO Method
- Fair Value
- Fair value through net income
- Finance Lease
- Financial Accounting
- Financial Disclosure
- Financial Functions in Excel
- Financial Instruments
- Financial Reporting
- Further Adjustments
- Future Value of an Annuity
- GAAP
- Gain Contingency
- Graded Vesting
- Gross Profit Method
- History of Accounting
- How to Prepare Cash Flow Statement
- Hybrid Organization
- Impairments
- Importance of Cash Flow
- Income Statement Accounts
- Income Tax Accounting
- Income from Continuing Operations
- Indirect Method Cash Flow
- Induced Conversion
- Installment Note
- Intangible Assets
- Interest Capitalization
- Interest Revenue
- Internal Control
- International Financial Reporting Standards
- Intraperiod Tax Allocation
- Inventory Accounting
- Inventory Cost Flow Assumptions
- Inventory Errors
- Inventory Systems
- Inventory Valuation Methods
- LIFO Method
- Lease Disclosure
- Lease Discount Rate
- Lease Expense
- Lease Purchase Option
- Lease Requirements
- Leases
- Long Term Contract Accounting
- Long Term Notes
- Loss Contingency
- Lower of Cost or Market
- Lower of Cost or Net Realizable Value
- Lump Sum Purchase
- Model Business Corporation Act
- NOL Carryback
- NOL Carryforward
- Net Operating Loss
- Non Cash Acquisition
- Non Current Liabilities
- Non GAAP
- Notes Payable
- Notes Receivable
- Notes to Financial Statements
- Objectives of Financial Reporting
- Open Account
- Operating Lease
- Overhead Allocation
- PP&E
- Paid in Capital
- Par Value
- Partial Year Depreciation
- Pension
- Pension Expense
- Pension Obligation
- Pension Plan
- Pension Plan Assets
- Permanent Differences
- Post Retirement Benefit
- Preparation of Financial Statements
- Prepayment
- Present Value of Lease Payments
- Present Value of an Annuity
- Prior Period Adjustments
- Profitability Analysis
- Property Dividend
- Prospective Approach
- Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Reports
- Quality of Earnings
- Reacquired Stock
- Receivables Financing
- Remeasurement of Lease Liability
- Research and Development Costs
- Residual Value
- Resource Depletion
- Restricted Cash
- Restricted Stock
- Retail Inventory Method
- Retained Earnings
- Retrospective Approach
- Revenue Recognition
- Revenue Recognition Issues
- Role of Auditor
- Self Constructed Assets
- Service Life
- Short Term Lease
- Simple Interest vs Compound Interest
- Software Development Costs
- Solvency Ratio
- Specific Identification Method
- Start Up Costs
- Statement of Cash Flows
- Stock Issuance
- Stock Option Plan
- Straight Line Method
- Structure of Cash Flow Statement
- Tangible vs Intangible Assets
- Tax Accounting
- Tax Rate Changes
- Temporary Differences
- Treasury Bonds
- Treasury Stock
- Types of Assets
- Types of Cash Flow
- Types of Corporations
- Types of Inventory
- Types of Lease
- Valuation Allowance
- Warranty vs Guarantee
- What is included in Inventory
- Introduction to Business
- Basic Financial Terms
- Business Enterprise
- Business Location
- Business Ownership
- Business Planning
- Classification of Businesses
- Evaluating Business Success Based on Objectives
- Measuring Success in Business
- Motivation in Entrepreneurship
- Reasons for Business Failure
- Risks and Rewards of Running a Business
- Managerial Economics
- Arc Elasticity
- Bertrand Oligopoly
- Block Pricing
- Cardinal Vs Ordinal Utility
- Commodity Bundling
- Conglomerate Mergers
- Constraints
- Consumer Equilibrium
- Consumer Expectations
- Consumer Search
- Contribution Analysis
- Cost Complementarity
- Cost Function
- Cournot Oligopoly
- Data-driven Decisions
- Decision Tree Method
- Demand Forecasting
- Demand Function
- Econometric Methods
- Economic Trade Off
- Economics Of Effective Management
- Employee Monitoring
- Equi-marginal Principle
- Finitely Repeated Games
- Firm Size
- Fixed And Sunk Costs
- Functions In A Business Firm
- Government Regulations
- Incremental Decision Making
- Individual demand vs Market demand
- Industry Classification
- Infinitely Repeated Games
- Information Economics
- Input Prices
- Isoprofit Curves
- Isoquant Curve
- Lagrangian Multiplier Method
- Least-cost Combination Of Inputs
- Manager Performance
- Marginal Rate Of Technical Substitution
- Marginal Returns
- Market Concentration
- Market Uncertainty
- Measuring productivity
- Nash Bargaining
- Net Present Value Method
- Ordinary Least Square Method
- Own Price Elasticity Of Demand
- Pay-back Period Method
- Point Elasticity
- Pricing Decisions
- Pricing Strategies For Market Leaders
- Properties Of Indifference Curve
- Properties Of Isoquants
- Quantitative Demand Analysis
- Research And Development
- Revealed Preference Theory
- Sequential Bargaining
- Signaling & Screening
- Simulation
- Sources Of Monopoly Power
- Specialized Investments
- Stackelberg Oligopoly
- Strategic Thinking
- Supply Function
- Survey Methods
- Sweezy Oligopoly
- Technology Supply and Demand
- The Five Forces Framework
- The Theory Of Individual Behavior
- The Time Value Of Money
- Total Product, Average Product, And Marginal Product
- Total Utility Vs Marginal Utility
- Types Of Monopolies
- Vertical Integration
- Vertical Vs Horizontal Integration
- What Is Dumping
- Managers
- Behavioral Theory in Organizational Management
- Charismatic Leaders
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Process
- Contingency Theory
- Decision Making
- Decision Making Model
- Dependence
- Ethical Decision
- Ethical Leadership
- Fiedler Contingency Model
- Impression Management
- Individual Differences
- Leader Member Exchange Theory
- Leadership
- Leadership Challenges
- Leadership Theories
- Management
- Negotiation
- Office Politics
- Organizational Leadership
- Organizational Politics
- Positive Leadership
- Social Network Analysis
- Stakeholder
- Trait Theory of Leadership
- Transactional Leaders
- Transformational Leadership
- Types of Conflict
- Nature of Business
- Business Aims and Objectives
- Cost
- External Environment
- Forms of Business
- Franchising
- Key Business Terms
- Limited Liability
- Non-Profit
- Revenue
- Sole Trader
- Operational Management
- Capacity
- Evaluating Total Quality Management
- Importance of Quality
- Improving the Supply Chain
- Inventory
- Measuring Quality
- Operational Data
- Operational Objectives
- Operational Performance Analysis
- Outsourcing
- Productivity and Efficiency
- Quality Management
- Total Quality Management
- Organizational Behavior
- Ability
- Affective Events Theory
- Attitude in the Workplace
- Behavioral Science
- Big Five Personality Traits
- Biographical Characteristics
- Bureaucratic Structure
- Causes of Stress at Work
- Challenges and Opportunities for OB
- Challenges of Management
- Choosing the Right Communication Channel
- Classification of Groups
- Conflict Results
- Contingent Selection
- Creative Behavior
- Cultural Values
- Dark Triad
- Decision Making Biases
- Direction of Communication
- Discrimination in the Workplace
- Diversity Management
- Diversity in the Workplace
- Effective Management
- Effective Negotiation
- Effective Teamwork
- Effects of Work Stress
- Emotional Intelligence
- Emotional Labor
- Emotional Regulation
- Employee Involvement
- Employee Selection Methods
- Evidence Based Management
- Factors Influencing Perception
- Functions of Emotions
- Functions of Organizational Culture
- GLOBE Framework
- Group Cohesiveness
- Group Decision Making
- Group Development Stages
- Group Norms
- Group Roles
- Group Status
- Group vs Team
- History of Motivation Theory
- Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions
- How to Measure Job Satisfaction
- Impact of Power
- Importance of Leadership in Human Resource Management
- Influences on Organizational Culture
- Initial Selection Process
- Innovative Organizational Culture
- Integrating Theories of Motivation
- Interpersonal Skills
- Job Attitude
- Job Dissatisfaction
- Job Satisfaction Causes
- Job Satisfaction Outcomes
- Leadership Trust
- Maintaining Organizational Culture
- Mechanistic vs Organic Structure
- Models of Organizational Behavior
- Modern Motivational Theory
- Myers-Briggs
- Negotiation Process
- Organizational Behavior Management
- Organizational Constraints
- Organizational Culture Problems
- Organizational Decision Making
- Organizational Structure Management
- Organizational Values
- Paradox Theory
- Perception in Decision Making
- Personal Stress Management
- Personality Models
- Personality and Values
- Personality at Work
- Planned Change in an Organization
- Positive Company Culture
- Power Tactics
- Power in Work
- Responsible Leaders
- Self-Evaluation
- Simple Structure
- Situation Strength Theory
- Social Loafing
- Stereotype Threat
- Stress Management in Organization
- Stress in the Workplace
- Substantive Selection
- Team Challenge
- Team Composition
- Team Player
- Team Process
- The Study of Organizational Behavior
- Third Party Negotiation
- Training Effectiveness
- Trait Activation Theory
- Types of Diversity
- Types of Emotions
- Types of Moods
- Types of Power in the Workplace
- Types of Teams
- Understanding and Developing Organizational Culture
- Unequal Power
- Values
- Virtual Organizational Structure
- Work Emotions
- Working as a Team
- Workplace Behavior
- Workplace Spirituality
- Organizational Communication
- Communication Barriers
- Communication Channels
- Communication Process
- Cultural Barriers
- Oral Communication
- Persuasive Strategies
- Types of Communication
- Written Communication
- Strategic Analysis
- Assessing Business Performance
- Business Considerations from Globalisation
- Competitive Environment
- Core Competencies
- Corporate Mission and Objectives
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Economic Change
- Economic Environment
- Financial Ratios
- Interest Rates in the UK
- Investment Appraisal
- Lifestyle and Technological Environment
- Non-Financial Data
- Porters Five Forces
- SWOT Analysis
- Social and Technological Environment
- Strategic Direction

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenExplore the vital elements of Put Call Parity in Corporate Finance with this comprehensive examination. Delve into the concept, its importance in business studies, and its intricate relation to American options. You'll find an in-depth analysis of the Put Call Parity formula, its components, and its application in business finance. Adjacent to this, you'll discover how dividends integrate within Put Call Parity and their implications. Furthermore, gain an understanding of arbitrage in relation to Put Call Parity and its practical implementations throughout business studies. To ensure a holistic grasp of the subject, this guide also illustrates the usage of the Call Put Parity equation and offers real-world examples and case studies of Put Call Parity applications.

Beginning to understand Put Call Parity in corporate finance means appreciating the vital role it plays in the pricing of options. This concept determines the relationship between the price of a European put option and its corresponding European call option. The same relationship exists, under certain conditions, for American options as well.

Understanding the theory of Put Call Parity is integral because it forms the basis for the valuation of options, providing insights into financial strategies and complex trading. This principle is crucial not only for finance students but also for business leaders intending to excel in corporate decision-making.

Put Call Parity is an essential concept in option pricing, stating that the price of a put option (an option to sell assets), and a call option (an option to buy assets), with the same strike price and expiration date, should lead to a riskless profit if they are priced differently.

- \(C\) represents the call option's price,
- \(P\) represents the put option's price,
- \(S\) is the current spot price of the underlying asset,
- \(X\) is the strike price,
- and \(PV(X)\) is the present value of the strike price, considering the risk-free interest rate and the time to maturity.

Suppose a share's current spot price is $105, with a strike price of $100 for a one-year European put and call option. If the call option is priced at $15 and the risk-free rate is 5%, by applying the Put Call Parity principle, we can calculate the price of the put option.

American options are unique in that they can be exercised at any point up to their expiration. This inherent flexibility alters how these options are priced. However, Put Call Parity can still provide a valuable relationship under specific circumstances—specifically, when the options are not exercised early.

While the Put Call Parity relationship is a key understanding tool used by traders to identify arbitrage opportunities, note that it doesn't always hold for American options due to their early exercise feature.

In today's fast-paced corporate world, leaders need every tool at their disposal, and the Put Call Parity is one such invaluable tool. Understanding this concept paves the way for sophisticated financial decision-making, particularly regarding investment in derivatives and risk management strategies in a company.

In the realm of corporate finance, Put Call Parity is a predictive tool that helps to balance the movement of put and call prices. When the parity is off, there may exist an opportunity for arbitrage—simultaneous purchase and sale of an asset to profit from a difference in the price.

Consider the example of an acquisition strategy, where a company opts to buy a major stake in another company. The purchasing company could use options to hedge against potential adverse price movements in the future. A correct understanding of Put Call Parity can provide a safety net in such scenarios.

Suppose a company plans to acquire a competitor but fears the competitor's stock price might increase. To hedge, the company could buy call options for the competitor's stock, thus fixing the purchase price. A drop in their stock price will increase the put option price due to Put Call Parity, thereby providing a hedge for the call option.

Before delving into the concept of options trading, it's important to fully grasp the Put Call Parity formula. This principle invites a clear understanding of how put options, call options and the underlying asset interact with each other in a well-balanced market.

The Put Call Parity formula is primarily composed of four key elements. These include the current price of the call option (\(C\)), the current price of the put option (\(P\)), the present value of the strike price discounted at the risk-free interest rate (\(PV(X)\)), and the current spot price of the underlying asset (\(S\)).

Each of these elements has a specific role to play in maintaining equilibrium in the options marketplace. **Call Option (\(C\)):** This is a financial contract which gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the underlying asset at a specified price (strike price) before or at the contract's expiration date.

**Put Option (\(P\)):** Contrary to the call option, a put option is a contract that grants the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying asset at a specified price before or at the expiry of the contract.

** Current Spot Price (\(S\)): ** The current spot price refers to the current market price at which the underlying asset can be bought or sold for immediate delivery.

**Present Value of Strike Price (\(PV(X)\)):** The present value of the strike price is the future strike price discounted back to today's value using the risk-free rate of interest.

To fully understand the Put Call Parity formula, it's beneficial to refer to a detailed illustration. The formula is written as:

\[ C + PV(X) = P + S \] When we rearrange these factors, they ensure that the value of a portfolio that includes a call option and the present value of its strike price is equal to the value of a portfolio that includes a put option and the underlying asset. Here's how:- The left-hand side of the equation, \(C + PV(X)\), represents a portfolio in which you buy a call option with a strike price of \(X\) and invest sufficient funds at the risk-free interest rate to attain \(X\) at the option's maturity.
- The right-hand side of the equation, \(P + S\), represents another portfolio, where you buy a put option with a strike price of \(X\) and also buy the underlying asset.

If there is a deviation from the parity, i.e., if either side of the equation is larger than the other, that represents an arbitrage opportunity. This is because you could then buy the cheaper portfolio, sell the more expensive one and make a risk-free profit.

In business finance, the application of the Put Call Parity extends to various financial strategies, risk management, and investment pricing.

For instance,Understanding the role dividends play within the Put Call Parity model is crucial to accurately determine the pricing of options in a real-world market, where underlying assets, such as shares, frequently pay dividends. A dividend payout reduces the stock's price on the ex-dividend date, thereby impacting the pricing of call and put options using Put Call Parity.

Put Call Parity is based on the notion that options are priced in an 'efficient' and 'frictionless' market. However, when dividends make an entrance, the market edge towards realism, disrupting this idyllic state. That’s because dividends alter the value of the options' underlying asset. To incorporate the presence of dividends in the Put Call Parity, we adjust the basic formula.

In the standard Put Call Parity formula, we consider that the underlying security does not offer any dividends between the time of purchase and expiration. However, if the underlying security pays dividends, the value of the call option decreases as the underlying price drops commensurate with the dividend paid. Conversely, the value of a put option tends to increase. Therefore, the standard Put Call Parity equation: \[ C + PV(X) = P + S \] transitions to: \[ C + PV(X) = P + S - D \] In this equation, \(D\) denotes the net present value of dividends expected to be paid out during the life of the option. **Net Present Value of Dividends (D) :** This refers to the current worth of the dividends to be paid out during the life of the option, discounted at the risk-free rate.

Dividends have a profound impact on the Put Call Parity formula and hence the pricing of options. Dividend payments reduce the price of the underlying asset on the ex-dividend date and thus, reduce the price of the corresponding call option while increasing the price of the corresponding put option. When pricing options using the Put Call Parity principle, it's crucial to account for any expected dividends the underlying security may generate during the option's life.

The revised formula hints at the market's dynamic nature. As dividends increase, the price of the call option decreases, emphasising that higher dividends are unfavourable for call buyers. Conversely, rising dividends are favourable for put buyers because they tend to increase the price of the put option. This understanding is crucial for individuals or companies trading in options or using them for hedging, investment, or financing strategies.In corporate finance, dividends play a prominent role in determining a company's investment and financing decisions, along with market perceptions and financial strategies.

If a company pays regular dividends, this may indicate a stable financial position. Yet, these dividends impact the pricing of options and consequently, the company's risk management strategies involving options. Therefore, understanding Put Call Parity with dividends is vital for corporate finance leaders in formulating investment and financing decisions. For instance, an investor deciding on whether to purchase a call option or a put option will consider expected dividends on the underlying stock. If dividends are expected to increase, the investor might lean towards buying a put option as they stand to benefit from the increase in the put option's price. Similarly, a decrease in expected dividends could make a call option more attractive. Moreover, for investors who use options to hedge their equity investments, understanding the effect of dividends on Put Call Parity is critical in evaluating and managing their potential risk. Integrating dividends within the Put Call Parity model brings us a step closer to a more practical and visceral understanding of options pricing. It certainly adds another layer of complexity, but it also provides traders, investors, and companies with a more comprehensive tool for managing risk and making better financial decisions.Moving further to uncover more critical aspects of Put Call Parity, the concept of arbitrage comes into the picture. Notably, arbitrage serves as a compelling force that operates behind the scenes to ensure that Put Call Parity holds in an efficient market.

Arbitrage refers to the practice of simultaneously purchasing and selling an asset in different markets to profit from the price discrepancy without bearing any risk. In the context of Put Call Parity, if the market prices of options don’t align with the parity relation, arbitrage opportunities can emerge. These opportunities are crucial for maintaining equilibrium in the options market.

The principle of no-arbitrage ensures Put Call Parity. It signifies that any two portfolios with identical payoffs should have the same market value; otherwise, arbitrageurs will seize the opportunity for risk-free profits. If the prices of put options, call options, and their underlying asset do not adhere to the Put Call Parity relation, arbitrage opportunities occur — enabling traders to exploit these discrepancies, prompting a market adjustment until parity is restored. By leveraging these risk-free chances, market participants help push the options prices back to equilibrium. Eventually, these market forces help establish and maintain Put Call Parity.Let's delve into a comprehensive example that elucidates how an arbitrage opportunity can arise based on a mispriced derivative and how it could be exploited.

Imagine a situation where a security trades at a spot price \(S\) of £50. A call and a put option with a strike price (\(X\)) of £52 have a current market price (\(C\) and \(P\)) of £2 and £3, respectively. If we assume a risk-free interest rate of 5% per annum, and the time to expiration (T) is one year, the present value of the exercise price (\(PV(X)\)) would be \(£52/(1+0.05) \approx £49.52\).

We then test these values for Put Call Parity. If Put Call Parity holds, the following equation should be balanced: \[ C + PV(X) = P + S \] In this case, our inputs yield £2 + £49.52 = £51.52 on the left side and £3 + £50 = £53 on the right side. Because £51.52 does not equal £53, we find the options are not in parity, hinting at an arbitrage opportunity. In this scenario, we perform an arbitrage strategy known as a "conversion", which consists of buying the underlying security, buying a put option, and selling a call option. The profit from this strategy will be: \[ Arbitrage Profit = P + S - C - PV(X) = £53 - £51.52 = £1.48 \] This arbitrage profit is risk-free and requires no initial net investment, as the debit side is financed by the credit side. The arbitrageur will continue to do this until the market prices adjust and the Put Call Parity is restored.The concept of arbitrage significantly impacts how Put Call Parity is perceived in business studies. It introduces the critical idea of no-arbitrage pricing, which is a cornerstone of modern financial theory.

From a business perspective, the no-arbitrage condition discusses the assumption that in a fully efficient market, there are no risk-free profits. The correction of price discrepancies via Put Call Parity arbitrage enhances market efficiency by ensuring the alignment of prices of derivates (call and put options) with their underlying security. Furthermore, understanding arbitrage and how it maintains Put Call Parity provides valuable insights into market dynamics, pricing strategies, risk management practices, and financial asset valuation. Therefore, in business studies, Put Call Parity arbitrage is an integral concept that has substantial implications for:- Fundamentally understanding Financial Markets
- Valuing Derivatives
- Structuring Complex Financial Products
- Managing Portfolio Risk
- Developing Algorithmic Trading Strategies

The core of any discussion on Put Call Parity lies in understanding the equation that represents it. The Call Put Parity equation, a fundamental concept in options pricing, ties together the prices of a call option, a put option, and their underlying asset in an equivalence relation. It forms a foundation in derivatives pricing theory and is an essential component of modern financial analytics.

To begin, the Put Call Parity equation is essentially represented as:

\[ C + PV(X) = P + S \] The equation implies that the cost of holding a call option (\(C\)) and investing cash amounting to today's present value of the strike price (\(PV(X)\)) should be equal to the cost of holding a put option (\(P\)) and the underlying asset (\(S\)). If it isn't, an arbitrage opportunity will arise, enabling risk-free profit and compelling the market back into equilibrium. Let's break down the terms:- \(C\) stands for the price of a European call option
- \(PV(X)\) represents the present value of the strike price (\(X\)) discounted at the risk-free rate
- \(P\) denotes the price of a European put option
- \(S\) symbolises the spot price, or current market price, of the underlying asset

**Arbitrage :** it refers to the presence of risk-free profit opportunities that arise due to price discrepancies between instruments or markets.

A practical example can help in comprehending how this equation works.

Suppose that you observe the following prices: A European call and put option have market prices of £7 and £1 respectively. They both have a strike price of £90. The current market price of the underlying asset is £95 and a risk-free rate of 5% per annum is given. The options will expire in exactly one year. To begin, compute the present value of the strike price (\(PV(X)\)) by discounting £90 at a rate of 5% for one year. This equates to \(£90/(1+0.05) \approx £85.71\). Now, test these values for Put Call Parity. According to the equation, \[ C + PV(X) = P + S \] By plugging the given values, \[ £7 + £85.71 =? £1 + £95 \] This gives you £92.71 on the left and £96 on the right. Since these two amounts do not equal, we infer that the options are not in parity, suggesting an arbitrage opportunity. The arbitrage process would involve selling the overpriced item (put option + underlying asset), and using those proceeds to purchase the underpriced items (call option + \(PV(X)\)), resulting in an instant risk-free profit of £96 - £92.71 = £3.29.

In corporate finance, the Call Put Parity equation plays a fundamental role in forming hedging strategies, calculating the fair value of options, and assessing the risk associated with derivatives. It's a handy tool for financial managers in making investment, financing, and risk management decisions.

For instance, a company can exploit the Put Call Parity concept to construct a synthetic put option if buying a real put option isn't feasible. Here, they would buy a call option, invest the present value of the strike price, and, theoretically, this would give them the exact payoffs as holding the real put option and the underlying asset. Moreover, given the Put Call Parity, corporate finance professionals can estimate the implied price of one security given the prices of the other securities. For example, if the prices of a call option, the underlying asset, and the risk-free bond are known, the price of the put option can be derived. Also, businesses that issue convertible bonds can exploit the Put Call Parity to decide upon the most advantageous time to convert their bonds into equity shares. The parity gives a fair view of which course of action would reap larger profits – converting the bonds or selling the call options they carry. From managing the financial risk of firm activities to structuring complex financial products, the Call Put Parity equation serves as a valuable tool in corporate finance. The understanding and ability to apply this equation can help better navigate the dynamic financial landscapes by making more informed and profitable decisions.The concept of Put Call Parity isn't just theoretical; it finds varied applications in the practical realm of finance as well. It helps in pricing options, creating synthetic positions, and uncovering arbitrage opportunities. Let's delve into how the Put Call Parity functions in the real business world.

Undeniably, the examination of Put Call Parity in a real-world context can deliver a pragmatic learning perspective of this pivotal concept. So, let's look at an example featuring a corporate treasury manager for a multinational company.

Imagine a company that relies heavily on imports of raw materials, and the payments for these imports are due in six months. The corporate treasury manager fears that market instability may lead to a devaluation of the home currency against the foreign currency upon payment due date. Left unprotected, such a situation might result in the company having to shell out more local currency to meet the same foreign currency obligation, thereby increasing costs. To hedge against this forex risk, the treasury manager decides to buy a call option contract. This call option gives the firm the right to purchase the foreign currency at a predetermined strike price at the end of six months. Let's denote the price of this call option by \(C\). At the same time, the corporate treasurer decides to invest an amount equal to the present value of the strike price at the risk-free rate of interest. This investment will grow to the exact foreign currency obligation the company has to meet at the end of six months. We denote the present value of the strike price by \(PV(X)\). Effectively, by purchasing the call option and investing the \(PV(X)\), the company has created a synthetic long position in the foreign currency. Irrespective of the currency exchange rate in six months, by exercising the call option or using the proceeds of the invested \(PV(X)\), the company will exactly meet its foreign currency obligation due at that time. Now, according to the Put Call Parity, \(C + PV(X) = P + S\), where \(P\) is the price of a put option and \(S\) is the spot price of the foreign currency. Therefore, had the firm decided to buy the put option and hold the foreign currency instead of buying the call and investing \(PV(X)\), the costs would have been identical. However, holding the foreign currency would expose the firm to foreign exchange risk, a situation they wanted to evade. Hence opting for a call option and investing \(PV(X)\) adheres to the risk management strategy, underscoring the practical value of the Put Call Parity in the real business world.

To further explore the real-world implications of Put Call Parity, let's consider a distinctive practical scenario wherein the underlying asset does not currently exist but will in the future—the case of forward contracts.

Suppose an investor wants to buy a physical commodity, say wheat, that is due for harvest after one year. Instead of waiting for a year and running the risk of price uncertainty, the investor opts to buy a forward contract today that allows them to buy the wheat at a specified delivery price one year from now. However, due to the absence of a spot commodity, there are no spot market transactions involving immediate exchanges between two parties. One might wonder, how could Put Call Parity hold in this case? This can be addressed with the help of call and put options on the forward contract (not on the spot commodity). These options provide the holders the right, but not the obligation, to enter a long or short position in a forward contract. In the context of Put Call Parity, these options on the forward contract can be matched with equivalent synthetic positions created by combining forward contracts with risk-free bonds. In such a situation, the Put Call Parity can be rewritten in terms of these forward contracts as: \[ C + PV(X) = P + F \] where \(F\) represents the price of the forward contract. Much like any other application of Put Call Parity, this setting ensures that opportunities for arbitrage are nonexistent, thereby aiding in options pricing and supporting the market efficiency of forward contracts.

Unlike European options, which can only be exercised at expiration, American options grant their holders the right to exercise them any time until expiration. Now, let's see how Put Call Parity applies in the case of American options through an example.

Assume you are observing the prices of a stock and its American call and put options, all with a strike price of £80. The current market price of the stock is £82, the American call option is priced at £4, and the American put option at £2. The risk-free rate is 5%, and the options will expire in one year. If we consider the European-style Put Call Parity here, we might be tempted to say that the options are not in parity because \(4 + 76.19 \neq 2 + 82\). However, this discrepancy does not necessarily imply an arbitrage opportunity because of the early exercise feature of American options. Namely, the Put Call Parity condition must be adjusted for American options to account for this early exercise flexibility. It can be considered as an inequality, given by: \[ C + PV(X) \geq P + S \] Applying this inequality to the given prices, we get \(4 + 76.19 \geq 2 + 82\), which holds true. Hence, the options are in 'parity', and there are no immediate arbitrage opportunities. This reflects the nature of American options where a premium is often added to account for the early exercise rights, causing their prices to deviate from the direct equivalence of Put Call Parity that is applicable to European options. This example highlights an interesting extension of Put Call Parity to American options and the importance of understanding how different types of options affect the application of this principle.

- Put Call Parity refers to the principle used in financial strategies, risk management, and investment pricing. It is used by firms to establish protective strategies against potential negative future price movements.
- Put Call Parity with dividends is incorporated to accurately determine the pricing of options in a real-world market. The formula adjusts for this by denoting D as the net present value of dividends expected to be paid out during the life of the option.
- Put Call Parity arbitrage is a principle that ensures two portfolios with identical payoffs should have the same market value. It results in equilibrium in the options market and allows for opportunities to exploit price discrepancies for risk-free profits.
- Understanding the Put Call Parity formula with dividends is integral for corporate finance leaders in formulating investment and financing decisions. It allows investors and traders to account for any expected dividends the underlying security may generate during the option's life.
- The Call Put Parity equation underpins options pricing theory, linking the prices of a call option, a put option, and their underlying asset. It is integral to financial analytics and embodies the law of one price which states that identical goods should have the same price.

Put-call parity is analysed by ensuring a balance between buying a stock, buying a put, and lending money against the alternative of buying a call and investing in a risk-free bond. The principle suggests that these two scenarios should be identical. If not, there's an arbitrage opportunity.

Put-call parity is a principle in options pricing which shows a relationship between the price of a European call option, put option and the underlying stock. Essentially, it states that the value of a call option at one strike price plus the present value of the strike price equals the value of the put option plus the underlying stock.

A good put-call ratio varies depending on market situation. Typically, a ratio above 1 indicates a bearish sentiment (more puts than calls), whereas a ratio less than 1 suggests bullish sentiment. It's often used as a contrarian indicator.

You use put-call parity for arbitrage by identifying disparities between the calculated parity price of a call or put option and its actual market price. If the market price differs, you can purchase the underpriced option and sell the overpriced one, resulting in risk-free profit.

Delta in put-call parity refers to the rate of change in an option's price relative to a change in the underlying asset's price. It quantifies the expected change in option price for a £1 change in the price of the underlying asset.

Flashcards in Put Call Parity12

Start learningWhat is the Put Call Parity principle in corporate finance?

The Put Call Parity principle states that the price of a put option and a call option, with the same strike price and expiration date, should lead to a riskless profit if they are priced differently. It's a key concept used for valuation of options.

How can Put Call Parity be used in corporate finance?

In corporate finance, Put Call Parity is a predictive tool that helps balance the movement of put and call prices. If the parity is off, there may exist an opportunity for arbitrage. It assists in financial decision-making, especially regarding investment in derivatives and risk management.

What are the four key elements that make up the Put Call Parity formula?

The four key elements of the Put Call Parity formula are the current price of the call option (C), the current price of the put option (P), the present value of the strike price discounted at the risk-free interest rate (PV(X)), and the current spot price of the underlying asset (S).

How does the Put Call Parity formula contribute to the equilibrium in options trading and business finance?

The Put Call Parity formula maintains equilibrium in options trading by ensuring that the value of a portfolio with a call option and the present value of its strike price is equal to the value of a portfolio with a put option and the underlying asset. In business finance, it helps in strategic pricing of bids, hedging and facilitating optimal investment decisions.

What is the role of dividends in the Put Call Parity model?

In the Put Call Parity model, dividends reduce the stock's price on the ex-dividend date, thereby affecting the pricing of call and put options. If the underlying security pays dividends, the value of the call option decreases, while the value of the put option increases.

How do dividends affect the Put Call Parity in Corporate Finance?

Dividends play a prominent role in pricing options and consequently affect a company's risk management strategies. If an investor expects dividends to increase, the investor might lean towards buying a put option, whilst a decrease in expected dividends could make a call option more attractive.

Already have an account? Log in

Open in App
More about Put Call Parity

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

- Flashcards & Quizzes
- AI Study Assistant
- Study Planner
- Mock-Exams
- Smart Note-Taking

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!

Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.

Already have an account? Log in