Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenWe all enjoy the benefits of globalisation, whether we realise it or not. But do we understand how it actually works?
We will be looking at globalisation and global organisations, specifically:
Within the topic of globalisation and global organisations, we'll be looking at the following:
We will start by defining globalisation.
Globalisation can be defined as 'the growing interconnectedness of different nations' economic, cultural and political spheres across the world.' (Livesey and Blundell, Cambridge International AS and A Level Sociology Coursebook, 2014).
Globalisation has been brought about by:
Faster and further-reaching methods of communication such as telephones, the internet, social media platforms, etc.
Quicker and cheaper methods of transport such as mass commercial air travel, larger container ships, etc.
The introduction of global organisations such as the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO.
A growing global economy; look at the increasing number and increasing power of transnational corporations (TNCs).
An increase in global social movements such as the debate over climate change policy, debt relief, and health outcomes.
To understand globalisation and its influence on the economic, political, and cultural relationships between societies we shall look at the following:
Economic globalisation
Political globalisation
Cultural globalisation
We will go through each in turn and consider examples as we go.
Economic globalisation is the growing economic connection between different countries in all parts of the world, typically highlighted by the international trade of goods. It is the emergence of a global marketplace: 'a single world market'.
You can see globalisation at work in the production and consumption of branded clothing, e.g. Nike, Primark, and ASOS. Such clothing is produced in developing countries (LEDCs) where labour costs are low, and consumed in developed economies (MEDCs) where wages are high - countries in the EU, USA, Australia, UAE etc.
Just look at any label on your clothing, the back of any electronic device or think about where a lot of where our fresh produce might come from, particularly in the winter. What you'll see is that they are produced and imported from all regions of the world.
Increase in the growth and power of TNCs, e.g., Unilever, Apple, or Shell. These drive a 'single world market' by bridging the production of goods in developing nations and selling them in developed countries.
Take Apple and the production and selling of an iPhone. It is made up of metals and rare earth materials like titanium, aluminium, and copper, which are mined globally. It is then shipped to be manufactured in China, where labour costs are low. It is then shipped again to be sold globally in developed countries and developing regions, where consumers can afford the near $1000 price tag attached to a new iPhone.
The 'McDonaldisation' (George Ritzer, 1993) of economic and cultural life. Ritzer highlighted that there had been a 'westernisation' of production, work, and consumption. This has become standardised globally. This westernisation, or McDonaldisation, has four organising principles: efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control.
Reduced power of national governments in controlling their economies. The increase in TNCs and the increase in international organisations shift power beyond national borders.
Shell is responsible for one-third of Nigeria's GDP!
Check out Underdevelopment and Global Inequality for more information. Remember to draw on this for theoretical support of economic globalisation.
Political globalisation refers to the amount of political cooperation that exists between different countries. It is the growth of a worldwide political system, both in size and complexity.
Political globalisation is the development of forms of governance that operate on a global scale, whose policies and rules cooperative nations are expected to abide by.
From the mid-20th century, new global forms of governance were created. In large part, these new global forms of governance led to institutions that set the rules for cooperation within the new global economy. These include the UN, the IMF, the WHO, the World Bank, etc.
Increase in decisions made by global organisations rather than national governments. As an example, the European Union and its regulations/laws affect all EU member states.
Increase in global problems that require international political cooperation to solve. Climate change and the UN Conference of Parties (COP) meetings, the ongoing refugee crisis, human trafficking, and the drugs trade are all examples of global problems that require international political cooperation.
The rise in transnational social movements. In other words, current global issues require arrangements between countries. Debt relief, global health (think COVID-19), the environment (think climate change policies) are all examples of global issues that have led to planet-wide movements.
National Governments can still decide policies like tax rates, and the kinds and amounts of social welfare individuals are entitled to.
The power of global organisations like the UN is dependent on the wilful cooperation of each national government. Just think about how little countries like China, India and the US have achieved in their most recent climate change pledges set by COP26. All three refused to sign a pledge to phase-out coal - responsible for producing 1/3 of all global greenhouse gas emissions. China refused to limit methane output. The US refused to support increasing green-development funds for poorer, less developed countries.
There has been a resurgence of nationalism. Look at Britain's decision to leave the EU in 2016, and the general increase in far-right parties being elected in Europe. What connects these is an increase in sentiment around anti-immigration policy.
First, we need a working definition. We can think of it as 'the movement of ideas, norms, values, beliefs and cultural products (ideologies) across national borders'. (Livesey and Blundell, Cambridge 2014).
In short, it is the spread and diffusion of ideologies. Importantly, this is not a neutral process. It is the ideologies of more powerful nations that spread, and it is these which frame political and economic globalisation. In the context of the 20th century and the beginning of globalisation, this can be seen with the spread of 'Western' ideologies.
The existence of worldwide information and media technologies, such as the internet.
The spread of American culture and consumption: e.g. McDonald's, hip-hop, or Starbucks.
Cultural homogenisation: e.g. the spread of Hollywood movies and beauty standards.
Spread of religions: 2.2 billion people are Christians, while Islam has 1.9 billion believers globally.
English as the unofficial 'global' language.
Sport and tourism with global participation, such as the Olympics.
The cultural flow of ideas can go both ways; there are mutual cultural influences between the East and West.
Greater access to the internet has allowed many to obtain information and ideas from people everywhere.
Cultural globalisation can be seen as cultural imperialism. Global development policies of the 20th century have led to Western values, such as democracy and gender equality, being imposed on non-western cultures.
The spread of Western ideologies degrades developing countries' local cultures and values.
Broadly speaking, there are three theoretical perspectives towards globalisation as a force. Anthony McGrew (2007) saw these as:
The neoliberals
The radicals
The transformationalists
Neoliberals are those who see globalisation as a positive force. This is because they view:
The spread of a capitalist 'single world market' as leading to global economic growth.
Western values such as democracy, gender equality, and the eradication of poverty as forces for good.
The whole population will benefit from raised standards of living by a 'trickle-down' effect of wealth produced by the profits of TNCs and private companies.
They are neo-Marxists. They view globalisation as a negative force in alignment with Andre Frank's (1971) dependency theory and Wallerstein's world-systems theory. Radicals argue that:
Economic globalisation primarily benefits developed, rich countries.
Transformationalists see globalisation as uncertain. They lie between the Radicals and the Neoliberals in how they view globalisation. They highlight:
New hybrid cultures that blend a variety of both western and non-western cultures is occurring ( 'glocalisation').
Cultural globalisation is a two-way process; there is not merely a process of cultural imperialism.
Globalisation may slow or even reverse.
Globalisation may act to transform old hierarchies between North/South and First World/Third World.
Think about the development of the UAE and Qatar through the global exporting of their oil.
These different perspectives can be used to highlight the pros and cons of globalisation! They can also be used to evaluate other theories. Make sure to use examples in your exam and make sure to evaluate globalisation from a range of perspectives.
Let's consider a definition of global organisations.
Global organisations are those that operate internationally and/or have branches in multiple countries. They are instrumental in providing different strategies for local and global development.
We've already provided some examples above of what global organisations are, but we will be looking at more specific examples below.
Let's study the different types of global organisations. Note that the following section is a brief overview of each type of global organisation. You will find a separate article on each of these.
Transnational corporations (TNCs) are businesses that have a global reach. Their large size gives them leverage and negotiating power with countries, which often compete with each other for TNCs to invest in them.
However, whilst modernisation theorists and neoliberals view TNCs positively, dependency theorists argue that they are exploitative, unethical, and immoral.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are non-profit organisations that operate to address a social or political issue. They are not associated with any particular government(s).
NGOs frequently work to solve issues of welfare, empowerment, education, and development.
Advantages of NGOs include their success and trustworthiness; however, they often have limited reach and sometimes have agendas attached to aid.
International organisations (IGOs) work across multiple countries to solve problems of development. IGOs can be split into the categories of economic IGOs and political IGOs, depending on their focus and effect.
Since we have looked at different types of global organisations, now let's examine some examples of each type of global organisation.
The broad function of global organisations is to address worldwide problems that, through globalisation, now require transnational action to address. However, 'global organisations' is an umbrella term. Therefore, to understand the exact nature of global organisations, we must look into the role of each individually.
Although global organisations share certain key characteristics, the function of global organisations depends greatly on the type of global organisation in question.
For example, the function of a TNC is business, and it is profit-orientated. For an NGO, the function is to alleviate human suffering - NGOs function to improve the quality of life of those most in need, etc. They therefore have very different, and even conflicting, practical functions.
A company's functions, teams, and personnel are outlined in a hierarchical framework called the organisational structure. Organisational structures outline the duties of employees, who they answer to, and how corporate decisions are made.
Global organisational structures simply refer to the hierarchies within global organisations such as TNCs and IGOs. These, like their individual functions, can often vary significantly.
Global organisations reduce government regulations by reducing the power of national government policy. To answer how they do this, we must first decide whether we are looking at economic, political, or cultural global organisations.
Broadly speaking, there are three types of global organisations: TNCs (transnational corporations), NGOs (non-governmental organisations), and International agencies (e.g. The UN, The World Bank, The WTO etc.)
This depends on the type of global organisation in question. For example, the function of a TNC is business, and it is profit-orientated. For an NGO, the function is to alleviate human suffering - NGOs function to improve the quality of life of those most in need, etc.
The nature of global organisations is to address worldwide problems, that through the process of globalisation, now require transnational action to address. However, global organisations is an umbrella term. Therefore, to understand the exact nature of global organisations, we must look into the role of each, individually.
This depends on the type of global organisation in question and their area of focus. For example, the scope of an NGO is very much different to the scope of a TNC. Likewise, the scope of the World Bank is very different to the scope of The World Health Organisation.
What is the definition of globalisation?
Globalisation is the 'growing interconnectedness of different nations' economic, cultural and political spheres across the world' (Livesey and Blundell, Cambridge 2014)
Name some of the factors that have brought about globalisation.
What is economic globalisation?
Hint: what has 'emerged'?
Economic globalisation is the growing economic connection between different countries in all parts of the world, typically highlighted by the international trade of goods. It is the emergence of a global marketplace: 'a single world market'.
What are some signs of a fully integrated global economy?
What is political globalisation?
Political globalisation refers to the amount of political cooperation that exists between different countries. It is the growth of a worldwide political system, both in size and complexity. It is the development of forms of governance that operate on a global scale, whose policies and rules cooperative nations are expected to abide by.
Provide some examples of global forms of governance.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in