History of Motivation Theory

Discover the fascinating journey through the history of motivation theory with this in-depth exploration. Uncover the origins, evolution, and pivotal changes of the concept that has significantly impacted the realm of business studies and beyond. You'll delve into detailed analysis, historical examples, and the central role of incentives in motivation theory. This exploration will provide you with a rich and comprehensive understanding of critical theories including achievement motivation theory, equity theory of motivation, and protection motivation theory. Immerse yourself in this enlightening journey and extend your knowledge on one of business studies' core subjects.

History of Motivation Theory History of Motivation Theory

Create learning materials about History of Motivation Theory with our free learning app!

  • Instand access to millions of learning materials
  • Flashcards, notes, mock-exams and more
  • Everything you need to ace your exams
Create a free account
Contents
Table of contents

    Unravelling the History of Motivation Theory

    The field you're exploring has a vibrant past laden with different theories that have greatly influenced how businesses operate today. Let's delve into the history of motivation theory and its role in shaping business practices

    Origin of Motivation Theory: The Beginnings

    The origins of motivation theory can be traced back to the early 19th Century.

    YearKey TheoristTheory
    Early 19th CenturyFredrick Winslow TaylorScientific Management Theory
    Mid 19th CenturyAbraham MaslowHeirarchy of Needs
    Late 19th CenturyFrederick HerzbergTwo-Factor Theory

    Scientific Management Theory, proposed by Fredrick Winslow Taylor, fundamentally focused on productivity and efficiency. Taylor believed that workers were primarily motivated by wages.

    The Hierarchy of Needs theory, proposed by Abraham Maslow, suggested that individuals are motivated by a series of hierarchical needs. This includes physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualisation needs.

    For instance, a person struggling with financial instability (physiological need) is unlikely to be motivated by the offer of a prestigious job title (esteem need) until the basic financial need is fulfilled.

    Evolution and Progression in the History of Motivation Theory

    The 20th Century brought significant advancements to the field of motivation theory.

    YearKey TheoristTheory
    Early 20th CenturyElton MayoHuman Relations Theory
    Mid 20th CenturyDouglas McGregorTheory X and Theory Y
    Late 20th CenturyDavid McClellandAcquired Needs Theory

    Elton Mayo's Human Relations Theory posited that workers are not solely influenced by money but also social dynamics and group norms. This emphasised the importance of managerial style, participative decision making and sense of belonging in the company.

    Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y outlined two contrasting models of workforce motivation. Theory X assumes employees are inherently lazy and need strict supervision, while Theory Y suggests that employees are self-motivated and thrive on responsibility.

    For example, a manager practicing Theory X might implement strict checks on their employees' work, believing it's the only way to keep them productive. Conversely, a Theory Y manager would enable employees to take ownership of their tasks, trusting in their intrinsic motivation.

    Detailed Analysis of Motivation Theories in History

    The development of motivation theories has been pivotal in shaping our understanding of what drives human behaviour in the workplace. The following sections will delve into the history of three major motivation theories, namely, the Achievement Motivation Theory, Equity Theory, and the Protection Motivation Theory.

    Examining the History of Achievement Motivation Theory

    The concept of Achievement Motivation Theory was first introduced by psychologist David McClelland in the late 20th Century. McClelland posited that people are motivated by three needs: achievement, affiliation, and power.

    The Need for Achievement is the drive to excel, to overcome obstacles and to strive for success.

    The Need for Affiliation is the desire for friendly and warm relationships with others.

    The Need for Power is the wish to influence, coach, teach, or encourage others to achieve.

    A person with a high need for achievement might start their own business, embracing the uncertainties and challenges that come with entrepreneurship, whereas a person with a high need for affiliation might prefer a job that allows for plenty of social interaction, like marketing or sales.

    Unpacking the History of Equity Theory of Motivation

    The Equity Theory of Motivation was developed by behavioural psychologist John Stacey Adams in the mid-20th Century. It is centred on the principle that people are motivated by their perception of fairness in social exchanges. It can be mathematically represented as: \[ \text{Output/Input ratio (Person)} = \text{Output/Input Ratio (Comparison Other)} \]

    A person's Outputs include rewards such as pay, recognition, and benefits, while their Inputs refer to their contributions, such as their effort, skills, experience, and time. The Comparison Other may either be another individual or a group.

    When the person perceives an imbalance in these ratios, they may feel under-rewarded or over-rewarded, leading to feelings of distress. This dissatisfaction may then prompt a variety of responses, ranging from reduced effort to requesting more compensation, in an attempt to restore balance.

    Exploring the History of Protection Motivation Theory

    The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) was initially proposed by R.W. Rogers in 1975 as an explanation for the effects of fear appeals on persuasion. PMT is based on the premise that people are motivated to protect themselves from physical and psychological harm and can be applied to understanding behaviours related to health and safety.

    It proposes that people assess the Severity of a potential threat, the Vulnerability to that threat, the Benefits of Preventive Behaviour, and the Costs associated with that Preventive Behaviour.

    The PMT has been used in various contexts, most notably to encourage safer health behaviours. For example, a person may assess the severity of the threat posed by smoking (severity), their susceptibility to lung cancer (vulnerability), the benefits of quitting smoking (response efficacy), and the challenges associated with quitting (response costs).

    Diving into the Facts: Examples in History of Motivation Crowding Theory

    In exploring the history of motivation theory, one fascinating concept that emerges is the crowding-out theory. Developed by economists in the late 20th century, it refers to the phenomenon where intrinsic motivation can get "crowded out" or reduced, by extrinsic factors such as monetary rewards.

    Early Examples in History of Motivation Crowding Theory

    A pioneering example of Motivation Crowding Theory is from a research study conducted by psychologist Edward Deci in 1971. In this experiment, Deci analysed the behaviour of students given a puzzle-solving task. His findings showed that introducing a monetary reward for task completion led to an eventual decrease in interest once the reward was removed.

    Motivation Crowding Theory suggests an interplay between extrinsic rewards (like money) or punishments, and intrinsic motivation, which is one's inherent desire to engage in an activity for its own sake.

    Another milestone study in the history of Motivation Crowding Theory was conducted by Richard Titmuss in 1970. Titmuss examined the impact of financial incentives on blood donations. His research revealed that offering monetary rewards to encourage blood donation led to a decrease in the willingness of donors to give freely, thus crowding out the intrinsic motivation of altruism.

    • Deci’s Puzzle Experiment, 1971 - Monetary rewards reduced intrinsic motivation towards problem-solving activities.
    • Titmuss's Blood Donation Study, 1970 - Financial incentives negatively affected the altruistic motivation for blood donations.

    One of the most remarkable aspects of these early examples can be seen in their application to real-world scenarios. Businesses and policymakers grappled with ensuring proper incentives without unintentionally demotivating their employees or citizens.

    Contemporary Instances in History of Motivation Crowding Theory

    In more recent times, motivation crowding theory continues to remain a crucial area of research with implications for various sectors, right from business and economics, to education, healthcare and public policy.

    One contemporary and influential instance came forward with the work of Bruno S. Frey and Felix Oberholzer-Gee in 1997. Studying the impact of performance-related pay in organisations, they found that performance incentives could crowd out intrinsic motivation if those incentives were perceived as controlling.

    Performance-related pay refers to a system where a portion of an individual's remuneration is directly tied to their performance or productivity at work.

    Another major instance was observed in a 2011 study by Uri Gneezy, Stephan Meier, and Pedro Rey-Biel. They evaluated the effectiveness of incentives in improving students' academic performance. Remarkably, while their study demonstrated some short-term benefit, they found that in the long term, monetary incentives negatively affected students' performance, reinforcing the crowding-out phenomenon.

    For example, the pay-for-performance system in education. While it may initially improve test scores by providing an extrinsic motivation (monetary reward), this could lead to a decline in students' intrinsic motivation to learn, ultimately affecting their academic performance detrimentally in the long-term.

    • Frey and Oberholzer-Gee’s Work on Performance-related Pay, 1997 - Performance incentives can diminish intrinsic motivation if perceived as controlling.
    • Gneezy, Meier, and Rey-Biel's Study on Educational Achievement, 2011 - While providing short-term gains, long-term reliance on monetary incentives can adversely affect performance.

    Contemporary research on Motivation Crowding Theory highlights the complex dynamics between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and its far-reaching implications on productivity and performance across multiple sectors.

    The Role of Incentive in Motivation: History of Incentive Theory of Motivation

    Within the wide range of motivation theories throughout history, Incentive Theory occupies a unique position. It asserts that people are primarily driven to perform and achieve by external rewards or incentives. The theory revolves around the concept of hedonism, proposing that individuals seek pleasure and avoid pain.

    Beginning and Development of the Incentive Theory of Motivation

    The inception of Incentive Theory can be traced back to B.F. Skinner's work on operant conditioning in the mid-20th century.

    Operant Conditioning is a learning process that involves changing behaviour by administering rewards (positive reinforcement) or punishments (negative reinforcement) after the behaviour occurs.

    Skinner's groundbreaking experiments on rats and pigeons showcased the power of rewards and punishments in shaping behaviour. This work played a foundational role in forming the basis of Incentive Theory.

    As the discipline of psychology evolved, so too did the Incentive Theory, moving beyond simple reward-punishment models to explore more complex aspects of motivation. For instance, Victor Vroom's Expectancy Theory built on the foundational principles of Incentive Theory but added a consideration for individual belief about the value of reward and the likelihood of achieving it. In this context, Vroom proposed his famous formula:

    \[ \text{Motivation} = \text{Expectancy} \times \text{Instrumentality} \times \text{Valence} \]

    Expectancy refers to the individual's belief about their ability to perform the task, Instrumentality involves the person's belief in the correlation between performance and outcome, while Valence relates to the value the person places on the reward.

    These developments provide valuable insights into understanding how Incentive Theory has evolved, highlighting its increasing complexity and applicability to real-world situations.

    Understanding the Current State of Incentive Theory of Motivation

    Today, Incentive Theory continues to be a subject of consequential interest in multiple disciplines, including economics, management, education and health care. It plays a pivotal role in aiding our understanding of how incentives can be utilized to motivate different behaviours.

    Companies often employ elements of the Incentive Theory to motivate their employees. For instance, they might offer bonuses, promotions, or recognition to incentivise high performance. Similarly, in education, grades, and distinctions can serve as extrinsic rewards motivating learners.

    A classic example within the workplace is a sales commission. Here, a salesperson's income varies directly with the amount of product they sell, creating a strong external incentive to maximise sales.

    A significant development in the current understanding of Incentive Theory is the recognition of potential downsides of over-reliance on external incentives. This understanding arises from the Motivation Crowding Theory, which posits that extrinsic rewards may decrease intrinsic motivation.

    The crowding-out effect is a crucial caution, especially in contexts where long term motivation and the quality of performance are significant, such as education and creative tasks. The aim then becomes balancing the use of incentives with fostering a natural interest and enjoyment in the task.

    Furthermore, the advent of neuroscientific approaches has opened the doors to explore the biological underpinnings of incentive-based motivation. This research into the neurobiology of reward has contributed to our understanding of the role of brain structures and neurotransmitters in mediating the influence of rewards and punishments.

    The current state of Incentive Theory, thus, represents a sophisticated field integrating insights from psychology, neuroscience, and organisational studies, and continues to hold substantial relevance in both theory and practice.

    Reviewing the Major Changes in the History of Motivation Theory

    The history of motivation theory stands as a testament to the evolving understanding of human behaviour, cognition, and performance. Unravelling these theories assists in gaining a comprehensive understanding of how these theories developed, and how their practical implications evolved over time.

    Major Milestones in the History of Achievement Motivation Theory

    The Achievement Motivation Theory, rooted in the works of psychologists such as David McClelland, posits that individuals are driven to perform and achieve, based on their intrinsic desire to excel and be successful.

    Achievement Motivation is defined as an individual's drive to succeed and achieve set standards of excellence.

    The theory saw its first significant development in McClelland's key work from the 1950s and 1960s. McClelland's theorisation, often known as the Need for Achievement (n-Ach) concept, was built on the premise that achievement-motivated individuals have an inclination towards tackling tasks of moderate difficulty, favour personal responsibility for outcomes, and desire concrete feedback on their work.

    \n

    Above all else, McClelland identified Achievement Motivation as a learned behaviour, greatly influenced by the socio-cultural environment, a departure from prior hypotheses that suggested motivation was merely a result of inborn drives.

    McClelland's Achievement Motivation Model

    \n
      \n
    • Moderate Task Difficulty - Achievement-motivated individuals prefer tasks that are challenging but achievable, providing a balance between risk and success.
    • \n
    • Preference for Responsibility - These individuals welcome the responsibility associated with outcomes, driving them to take personal control of tasks.
    • \n
    • Concrete Feedback - They also seek clear and tangible feedback on their performance, enabling the fulfilment of their need for achievement.
    • \n

    Further progress in understanding Achievement Motivation was made in the latter part of the 20th century with John Atkinson's Risk-Taking Model of Achievement, which attempted to predict behaviour in risky situations. The Atkinson Model proposed its equation as:

    \[ \text{Motivation} = \text{Achievement Drive} \times \text{Expectancy} \times \text{Incentive} \]

    Achievement Drive refers to the desire to accomplish something significant. Expectancy is the individual's assessment of the likelihood of success. Incentive is the value of the success as perceived by the individual.

    In the 21st century, achievement motivation theory continues to thrive, with researchers exploring the nuances of this motivation in different socio-cultural contexts and its application in areas like sport psychology, education, and business.

    Important Turning Points in the History of Equity Theory of Motivation

    Equity Theory, formulated by John Stacey Adams in 1963, became a critical framework for understanding motivation in interpersonal relationships.

    Equity Theory asserts that individuals strive for fairness in social exchanges or relationships and they feel motivated to maintain this state of equity or balance.

    Adams developed the Equity Theory with work relationships specifically in mind. This theory stipulates that workers are most motivated when they perceive their rewards (pay, benefits, recognition) to be equal to their inputs (effort, skill, experience). Over time, the concept moved beyond the realm of work relationships to encompass other interpersonal relationships.

    One defining element of Adams's theory was its focus on subjective perceptions of fairness. Adams suggested that what matters in motivation is not an objective measure of equity, but individuals' personal sense of fairness. This insight marked a significant departure from previous motivation theories that relied heavily on objective measures of reward and punishment.

    A significant breakthrough came in the late 20th century with the findings that perceptions of equity can have a profound impact on job satisfaction and organisational commitment. Later research extended the theory to understand behaviours such as turnover, absenteeism, and work performance.

    Significant Steps in the Development of Protection Motivation Theory

    Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), introduced by Rogers in 1975 in the field of health psychology, posits that people protect themselves based on four factors: perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, response efficacy, and self-efficacy.

    Protection Motivation Theory is a psychological framework that explains why people take protective measures to avert threats, focusing on the individual’s motivation to protect themselves.

    The original development of PMT was in the context of explaining why people adopt health-protective behaviours. Rogers' initial model posed that when confronted with a health threat, individuals assess the threat's severity, their vulnerability to the threat, the benefits of the recommended response action, and the barriers to taking that action. Following this assessment, people would develop their motivation and decision to engage in protective behaviour.

    In the early 1980s, PMT evolved with the inclusion of the 'Coping Appraisal' component, which introduced two new determinants - response efficacy and self-efficacy. Rogers proposed that a person would be motivated to protect themselves if they believed the protective measure was effective and they were confident in their ability to perform it.

    Protection Motivation Variables

    \n
      \n
    • Threat Appraisal - Involves the assessment of Severity (how serious is the threat) and Vulnerability (what is the likelihood of experiencing the threat).
    • \n
    • Coping Appraisal - Comprises Response Efficacy (believing in the effectiveness of the protective measure) and Self-Efficacy (the confidence in one's ability to carry out the protective measure).
    • \n

    In more recent times, PMT has been applied extensively beyond health behaviours, finding relevance in areas like disaster preparedness, cyber security, and environmental conservation. As a result, it stands as a critical milestone in the history of motivation theory.

    History of Motivation Theory - Key takeaways

    • The Need for Affiliation is defined as the desire for friendly and warm relationships with others.
    • The Need for Power refers to the wish to influence, coach, teach, or encourage others to achieve.
    • The Equity Theory of Motivation, developed by John Stacey Adams, is based on the principle that people are motivated by their perception of fairness in social exchanges. It suggests that an imbalance in the input/output ratio can lead to distress and trigger actions to restore balance.
    • The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT), proposed by R.W. Rogers in 1975, suggests that individuals are motivated to protect themselves from physical and psychological harm. Individuals evaluate the severity of a potential threat, their vulnerability, the benefits of preventive behaviour, and the associated costs.
    • The Motivation Crowding Theory posits that intrinsic motivation can be "crowded out" by extrinsic factors like monetary rewards. Early studies by Edward Deci and Richard Titmuss provide evidence of this phenomenon.
    • The Incentive Theory of Motivation states that people are primarily driven to perform and achieve by external rewards or incentives. Concepts related to this theory include Skinner's concept of operant conditioning and Vroom's Expectancy Theory.
    • The Achievement Motivation Theory, rooted in David McClelland's work, posits that individuals are driven to perform based on their intrinsic desire to succeed. Notable aspects of this theory include preference for moderate task difficulty, responsibility for outcomes, and the desire for feedback.
    Frequently Asked Questions about History of Motivation Theory
    What is the historical development of motivation theory in the field of business studies?
    The historical development of motivation theory in business studies began with Taylor's Scientific Management Theory in the early 1900s. It progressed to Hertzberg's Two-Factor Theory and Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in the mid-20th century. Modern theories include Self-Determination Theory and Expectancy Theory.
    Who are the key figures in the history of motivation theory in business studies?
    The key figures in the history of motivation theory in business studies include Frederick Herzberg, Abraham Maslow, Clayton Alderfer, David McClelland, and B.F. Skinner.
    What are the major milestones in the evolution of motivation theory within business studies?
    The major milestones in the evolution of motivation theory include Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs (1943), Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory (1959), Vroom's Expectancy Theory (1964), Alderfer's ERG theory (1969), and Locke's Goal-setting Theory (1968). These theories revolutionised understanding of employee motivation and satisfaction.
    How has the history of motivation theory impacted modern business strategies?
    The history of motivation theory has significantly influenced modern business strategies by emphasising the importance of understanding employee needs and motivations. It has informed strategies such as goal-setting, rewards systems, and job design, aiming to increase productivity and job satisfaction, fostering a more engaged and motivated workforce.
    What are the key turning points in the history of motivation theory in business studies?
    Key turning points in the history of motivation theory in business studies include Frederick Taylor's scientific management theory (1911), Elton Mayo's Hawthorne studies (1930s), Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs (1943), and Frederick Herzberg's two-factor theory (1959).

    Test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards

    Who proposed the Scientific Management Theory in the early 19th century?

    What is the Hierarchy of Needs theory proposed by Abraham Maslow?

    What does Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y propose?

    Next
    1
    About StudySmarter

    StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.

    Learn more
    StudySmarter Editorial Team

    Team History of Motivation Theory Teachers

    • 17 minutes reading time
    • Checked by StudySmarter Editorial Team
    Save Explanation

    Study anywhere. Anytime.Across all devices.

    Sign-up for free

    Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

    Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

    The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

    • Flashcards & Quizzes
    • AI Study Assistant
    • Study Planner
    • Mock-Exams
    • Smart Note-Taking
    Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App