|
|
Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Are humans inherently selfish? Are we living in a dog-eat-dog world? Certainly, competition for resources and mates has been one of the driving forces in human evolution. Still, just like we're driven to compete with others for success, we also have a drive for cooperation, support, and care. Let's dive into the psychology of prosocial behaviour!

Mockup Schule

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Illustration

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
Illustration

Are humans inherently selfish? Are we living in a dog-eat-dog world? Certainly, competition for resources and mates has been one of the driving forces in human evolution. Still, just like we're driven to compete with others for success, we also have a drive for cooperation, support, and care. Let's dive into the psychology of prosocial behaviour!

  • We'll start by defining prosocial behaviour in psychology and looking at some prosocial behaviour examples, as well as the difference between prosocial behaviour and altruism.
  • Is prosocial behaviour innate or learned? We'll examine the examples of prosocial behaviours in early childhood.
  • Moving on, we'll look at the factors affecting helping behaviour and how it relates to the bystander effect.
  • Finally, we'll outline the benefits of prosocial behaviour for society and the individual.

Examples of Prosocial Behaviour

Prosocial behaviour refers to actions performed to benefit others. In plain English, we usually call prosocial behaviours helping. There is a whole range of actions that fall into this category, so let's first distinguish the two main types of prosocial behaviour:

  • Mutualism or cooperation

  • Altruism

Cooperation occurs when both the actor and the recipient benefit from the action. In hunter-gatherer societies, everyone had a way to contribute to the group; some people hunted, some sought out berries or edible plants others took care of children. This way, everyone benefited from the work of others.

Let's say you've arranged with your partner that they wash the dishes whenever you cook. If this is the preferred arrangement for both of you, you both can benefit from it.

On the other hand, altruistic behaviour benefits the recipient with no benefit to the actor.

This could involve anything from volunteering to help someone carry their shopping home, helping your siblings with homework, or donating a kidney to a stranger.

The common denominator in all these examples is that the act is selfless, with no expectations that the other person will return a favour.

The motivations behind prosocial behaviours can be diverse; they can be part of the social norms. When it's customary to offer help, we don't think twice about whether we should do it or not. We can also be motivated by reciprocity. We might want to help people that have helped us before. Other times, we might be motivated by empathy – we help them because we want others to help us in a similar situation. We'll break down the theories which highlight how all these motives can inform our actions.

Prosocial behaviour and altruism, volunteers distributing food donations, StudySmarterFig 1 - We've seen the power of prosocial behaviour in community responses to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Differences Between Prosocial Behaviour and Altruism

Altruism is a type of prosocial behaviour. Contrary to other prosocial behaviours, it involves a selfless concern for the well-being of others. Altruistic behaviour refers to acts that benefit others with no benefit to you or at a cost to yourself. It can be motivated by genetic survival, feelings of empathy, or social norms, but it's not motivated by reciprocity.

One evolutionary explanation points to increasing genetic survival as a reason behind altruism. When we direct altruism towards someone genetically related to us, like our child, helping them means improving the reproductive success of our genes. For example, mothers can stay awake all night taking care of a crying baby, even if it means going to work exhausted the next day.

Social learning theory: examples of prosocial behaviours in early childhood

Research has found that children spontaneously help others early, but why is it so? According to the social learning theory, children learn to be prosocial through reinforcement and exposure to social norms.

Growing up, we learn helping behaviour by being exposed to social norms like reciprocity (if you do good to others, they will repay with the same behaviour) or social responsibility (we are responsible for helping those who depend on us).

As children, we are also rewarded for helping others, and we are told off for behaviour that is harmful to others. This way, we learn to act prosocial in the future.

Gentile et al. (2009) demonstrated that exposure to prosocial video games encouraged more prosocial behaviour in children and young adults. He found that students who played prosocial games before an experimental task acted in a way that benefited others. In contrast, students who played aggressive video games acted in a way that hurt others. This study demonstrated that the behaviour we are exposed to could predict how we act toward other people.

However, other studies suggest that prosocial behaviour might be present in early childhood before we begin to learn about social norms (Warneken and Tomasello, 2006); this might suggest something intrinsic about helping behaviour.

Prosocial Behaviour and Altruism, a boy sitting on a bed with game console in his hands, StudySmarterFig 2 - Some studies suggest that we learn how to behave from the content we are exposed to.

Factors Affecting Helping Behaviour

The bystander effect is one phenomenon that gives us insight into what factors affect helping behaviour. The bystander effect refers to situations when people fail to act in an emergency because of the presence of other bystanders.

One factor contributing to helping behaviour is feeling responsible for acting. Let's consider one popular example illustrating the bystander effect – the case of Kitty Genovese, who was murdered outside of her New York flat in the 1960s. After her murder, it was reported that 38 people witnessed the murder but did not respond during the entire 35 minutes that the murder was occurring.

The presence of multiple other people that could act instead of us can reduce the feeling of personal responsibility to help the person in need.

Another explanation for the bystander effect is pluralistic ignorance. People base their judgements on the reactions of others. If we don’t see others around us reacting, we might conclude there is no emergency. It, therefore, takes effort to be the first person to react when surrounded by an ignorant crowd.

Piliavin et al. (1969) Subway Samaritan study

Pilavin and colleagues experimented on bystanders in an everyday environment. They watched the responses of people travelling on the New York subway to a person collapsing. They were specifically interested in whether the reaction of bystanders would be affected by the victim's personal characteristics.

  • They found that when the person, who collapsed was using a walking cane, people helped them 95% of the time, but when the person, who collapsed was acting like a drunk they were only helped 50% of the time.

  • When they manipulated the race of the victim, there was no difference in helping behaviour when the victim was using a mobility aid. However, in the drunk condition, the victim was less likely to be helped by a bystander of an opposite race.

  • Interestingly, the number of other bystanders did not influence the speed of helping, meaning that the diffusion of responsibility played little role in influencing helping behaviour.

According to the authors, when we are exposed to an emergency where someone might require help, we are motivated to act because of the physical arousal we experience. However, whether we act or not further depends on our cost-benefit analysis of the situation. We engage in helping behaviour when the benefits outweigh the costs.

If you were a participant in the Pilavin study, you might consider helping a person with a cane to be more rewarding and have fewer costs. Some benefits would include feeling better about helping someone in need, being seen as a good person by others, or receiving gratitude from the person. On the other hand, helping a drunk person might carry more perceived risks for you and potentially fewer rewards, so you're less likely to do it.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism, people sitting on a Subway, StudySmarterFig 2 - Pilavin et al. studied factors affecting helping behaviour on a Subway

Levine et al. (2001) Cross-cultural altruism

To investigate the potential cross-cultural factors that could influence helping behaviour, Levine and colleagues set up a series of repeated experiments in large cities across 23 countries. They measured helping in non-emergency situations (a person dropping a pen or a person in a leg brace dropping magazines) and emergencies (a blind person attempting to cross the street).

The researchers analysed the correlations between the population size, the economic situation, individualism-collectivism and walking speed in each country with the helping behaviour observed. It was found that the only variable that correlated with helping behaviour was the economy.

  • People in richer countries were less likely to help strangers than those in poorer countries.

  • Moreover, people engaged in helping behaviour more in Latin America, this was linked to simpatia, which is a cultural value of working towards harmony in society and cultivating warm interpersonal relationships.

In the study, Levine demonstrates how economic or cultural factors can affect people's likelihood to engage in prosocial behaviour.

Benefits of Prosocial Behaviour

When considering the benefits of prosocial behaviour, we must consider the benefits to society and the individual.

Prosocial behaviour can certainly benefit society as a whole. It encourages reciprocity and cooperation or even selfless support of others in need. If prosocial behaviour is the standard, we can feel safe that we won't be left alone when we are in need. Moreover, groups can often achieve more than a single person, which benefits the productivity of a society. For example, in hunter-gatherer societies, men hunted in groups rather than alone. By hunting in groups, they could hunt down bigger prey than alone.

From an individual perspective, the benefits of prosocial behaviour can contribute to the decision to act prosocially (cost-benefit analysis). These benefits can be direct or indirect. We directly benefit when we receive something in return from the person we helped or indirectly when the action makes us feel better about ourselves or improves our reputation in the community.

We can consider indirect benefits even when engaging in seemingly altruistic actions. For example, we might decide to donate blood because we know that other people admire blood donors.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism - Key takeaways

  • Prosocial behaviour refers to actions performed with an intention to benefit others. Examples of prosocial behaviour include cooperation and altruism.
  • We see evidence of prosocial behaviour as soon as in early childhood. According to the social learning theory, children learn to be prosocial through reinforcement and exposure to social norms.
  • Research on the bystander effect suggests that factors influencing prosocial behaviour include perceived responsibility, pluralistic ignorance, the cost-benefit analysis, as well as, cultural and economic factors.
  • Piliavin et al. (1969) investigated the influence of the victim's characteristics on helping behaviour, while Levine et al. (2001) analysed cross-cultural variables that could influence prosocial behaviour.
  • Prosocial behaviour can involve benefits to the society as a whole as well as benefits to the individual.

References

  1. Levine, R. V, Norenzayan, A. & Philbrick, K. (2001) Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32, (5), 543–560.
  2. Piliavin I. M., Rodin, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1969). Good samaritanism: an underground phenomenon?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 13(4), 289.
  3. Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., Bushman, B. J., Rowell Huesmann, L., & Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 35(6), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045

Frequently Asked Questions about Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Altruism is a type of prosocial behaviour. Contrary to other prosocial behaviours, which can involve reciprocity or some benefits to the actor, altruistic behaviour comes with no benefit or at a cost to the actor.

Prosocial behaviour can result in benefits to society as a whole. It encourages reciprocity and cooperation or even selfless support of others in need. If prosocial behaviour is the standard, we can expect others to help us once we need it.

Prosocial behaviour can be driven by altruism but it's not always the case. In some cases, prosocial behaviour is driven by expectations of reciprocity or mutual benefit.

Examples of prosocial behaviour include volunteering, taking care of others, donating blood or protecting others from harm by taking action at the time of emergency.

Prosocial behaviour can be studied using surveys or experiments. Experiments can involve presenting participants with an opportunity to help a person in need and recording their behaviour.

Test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards

How many countries was the study conducted in?

Did individualism vs collectivism make a difference to helping behaviour?

You've arranged with your partner that whenever you cook, they wash the dishes. This is an example of ____

Next

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Study Planner
  • Mock-Exams
  • Smart Note-Taking
Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Entdecke Lernmaterial in der StudySmarter-App

Google Popup

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Study Planner
  • Mock-Exams
  • Smart Note-Taking
Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App