4.8 • +11k Ratings
Save
Print
Edit
Reconstructive memory is a theory of memory that states that memories consist not only of what it encodes and stores but of prior knowledge in the form of schemas.
Schema is a pre-existing mental representation or expectation of something based on prior knowledge.
Bartlett (1932) first proposed the notion of reconstructive memory.Memories are not like a tape recorder that plays back an exact recording. Instead, it reconstructs them imaginatively.According to our schemas, we alter our memories to fit what we expect them to be.We reconstruct memories by trying to fit them into our existing schemas, and the more difficult this is, the more likely it is that some things will be forgotten and distortions will occur.
Reconstructive memory refers to the process of assembling information from stored knowledge when there is no clear memory of an event.
We have already established that our memory makes use of schemas. But how does this happen?
We have schemas for all sorts of things, such as how we see a criminal or what counts as food.
Our memory uses these schemas to organise things. When we remember an event, our schemas tell us what should happen.
Schemas fill in the gaps in our memory (confabulation) and influence us to remember things that fit our schema. Details in our memories can even be changed or removed.
Sometimes we assimilate new information, i.e., we change our schemas to fit what we have learned.
Other times, we accommodate new information, i.e., we change our memories to fit our existing schemas.
Bartlett explains that accommodation occurs in two ways:
Levelling, which refers to downplaying or removing details from memory.
Sharpening, which is adding to or exaggerating details.
We accommodate new information by changing our memories to fit our existing schemas, Freepik
Let’s now explore some studies of reconstructive memory to get a grip on the subject.
Bartlett chose this story because it was culturally unfamiliar to the participants.
Participants read the story and subsequently recalled it on several occasions: after several hours, weeks, days, months, or even years (repeated reproduction).
They also had to read the story and reproduce it to other participants (serial reproduction).
Bartlett found that participants changed the story as they tried to remember it (a process called distortion).Three patterns of distortion occurred:
1. Assimilation: they changed the story to better match the participants’ cultural expectations (schemas), e.g., canoes and paddles became boats and oars. Thus, details of the story were unconsciously changed to fit British cultural norms. A memory was filled in by adding new information to make sense.
2. Levelling: the story also became shorter when participants retold it, omitting information they considered unimportant. The word count dropped from 330 to 180 (the shortest count was a retelling after the longest time, which was two years).
3. Sharpening: participants changed the order of events in the story to make more sense to them. They also used more familiar terms to them from their own culture. They also added details or emotions that were not initially present.
Overall, participants remembered the story’s main themes, but the unfamiliar aspects were changed to fit the participants’ own cultural expectations and be better remembered. This shows that we reconstruct our memories according to our schemas.
Serial duplication seemed to reverse the description of their appearances, to the point of describing the black character as holding a knife (there were no knives in the original).
Given the participants’ existing mental representations, information was altered through accommodation to correspond to and fit within their schemas.
Participants who were asked the question with the verb ‘smashed’ recalled a higher speed of the cars (average 40.5 mph) than those who were asked with the word ‘hit’ (average 34 mph).Another group of participants watched a clip about a car accident and then answered a questionnaire about the speed of the cars (the verbs were either ‘hit’ or ‘smashed’). A week later, participants had to complete another questionnaire with the crucial question, ‘Did you see any broken glass?’ (There wasn’t any in the clip).
Incorrect recall: who reported seeing broken glass?
12% of the control group (who were not asked the speed question at all).
14% of the ‘hit’ group.
32% of the ‘smashed’ group.
Loftus and Palmer concluded that eyewitness testimony is unreliable because leading questions can influence it. Memory is reconstructed; it changes as we incorporate new information we learn after an incident. When we hear the word ‘smashed’, our schemas tell us there should be broken glass, and therefore we alter our memories to think that there was. After this change, it is difficult to distinguish which memories are true and false. There is no way back to the original.
Strengths | Weaknesses |
Since the 1930s and Bartlett’s study War of the Ghosts, lots of further research supported the idea of schemas. Loftus conducted a series of laboratory experiments on reconstructive memory and had strict experimental controls, collected quantitative data, and standardised procedures, which made them quite objective and reliable. | Bartlett’s study did not include many experimental controls. He asked participants to retell the story whenever it was convenient for them and did not set the same time frame for all participants. In addition, there was no scoring system. Bartlett measured the changes made to the story subjectively, in his opinion. |
Schemes can explain false memories. In a 2005 terrorist attack, witnesses saw a man named Charles De Menezes shot by police when they mistook him for a terrorist after the 7/7 bombing in London. The witnesses’ accounts varied widely and were often exaggerated. Their schemas about terrorists may have influenced their memories through sharpening and levelling. | Bartlett’s research was quite unrealistic and had no ecological validity, because asking British males to recall a Native American ghost story is unusual. However, Bartlett argued that the story had to be strange to cause participants to level and sharpen the details in their memories. |
The theory of reconstructive memory is similar to Tulving’s theory of semantic memory because schemas are similar to semantic stores in which we keep our understanding and knowledge of relationships and rules. Thus, if one is true, it makes the other more plausible. Moreover, this suggests semantic memory has an even greater influence on episodic memory since pre-existing knowledge (schemas) can influence our recollection of events according to the theory of reconstructive memory. | One criticism of reconstructive memory theory is that it does not explain how we reconstruct memories, unlike other cognitive theories that explain the processes involved. Other approaches mention specific processes and brain parts where they occur (using lesion and brain scan studies). We do not know how schemas are formed, how they alter memories, where they are located, etc. |
We can apply schemas knowledge to patients with memory loss (e.g., Clive Wearing) or dementia patients. They can still remember important schemas even if their amnesia confuses them, which can help reassure and focus them (e.g. Clive Wearing knew he loved his wife and the piano). We can also apply it to police work. Changes have been made to the way police deal with eyewitness testimonies and criminal evidence due to research into reconstructive memory. | Allport and Postman’s study is widely misrepresented. Many psychology textbooks and websites claim they showed participants a different picture (two white men, one holding a knife to the other). The white participants mistakenly remembered a black man holding the knife. However, this was NOT in the original study. |
Reconstructive memory refers to the process of piecing together information from stored knowledge when there is no clear memory of an event.
Memories are not like a tape recorder that plays back an exact recording. Schemas (pre-existing mental representations) can influence and change our memory when we try to remember something.
Memories consist not only of what it encodes and stores but of prior knowledge in the form of schemas.
It tells us that our memory is not always accurate and can be changed. Therefore, changes have been made to the way police deal with eyewitness testimonies and criminal evidence due to research into reconstructive memory. It also provides more information about dementia and memory loss patients in that they still have schemas, which can help calm and focus them.
Memories consist not only of what it encodes and stores but of prior knowledge. According to our schemas, we change our memories to make them fit what we expect to happen. We do this through accommodation, which works in two ways: levelling, which is downplaying or removing details from memory, and sharpening, which is adding or exaggerating details.
Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
