StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
HM is a famous case study that significantly advanced our understanding of memory. This case study revealed that:
Specific brain regions are responsible for memory and learning processing.
The hippocampus is an important part of the brain responsible for memory.
Different brain regions are responsible for the retrieval of memories and the formation of new memories.
Different parts of the brain are responsible for short-term memory, long-term memory, and other types of memory, such as procedural memory.
The patient HM suffered from severe epileptic seizures. To relieve them, he underwent surgery in 1953 to remove both (bilateral) medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampi. It was not known that the hippocampus was needed for memory formation. HM Seizures decreased significantly, but his long-term memory was no longer present. After surgery, he could no longer form new memories, but his short-term memory remained intact.
Previous research on the patient HM has shown that different brain parts are responsible for different types of memories. Schmolk et al. (2002) investigated which area of the brain is responsible for long-term semantic memory. The research goal was to learn more about semantic knowledge in patient HM and other patients with bilateral medial and lateral temporal lobe damage.
Semantic long-term memories are long-term memories that do not stem from personal experiences. They are facts and knowledge acquired throughout life.
An example of semantic memory is knowledge of facts about the world, such as the order of the colours of the rainbow, the capitals of countries, etc.
Schmolck et al. (2002) wanted to investigate the relationship between damage to the lateral temporal cortex and performance on semantic tests. They also wanted to find out if there were any peculiarities in the test performance of HM compared to other patients.
The design of the study included the following variables and samples:
This study was a natural experiment. The naturally occurring IV was the patients’ brain lesions.
Participants were presented with nine tests on three to five occasions. Seven tests were from the Semantic Test Battery (Hodges et al., 1992a). In addition, the researchers developed two tests of their own. The tests were all based on line drawings of 24 animals and 24 objects and their names. The animals and objects could be classified into eight categories, e.g., land animals and aquatic creatures.
The researchers gave the participants nine tests:
Four additional tests were performed. Researchers have previously used these tests to examine semantic knowledge in patients with semantic dementia or Alzheimer’s disease.The four additional tests were:
For example, one card contained the target picture of a saddle with two test pictures of a horse and a goat. The participant had to select whether the horse or the goat matched the saddle. The word version of this test consisted of words on cards instead of pictures.
The study used a repeated-measures design to measure the cognitive test scores.
Most test scores were calculated as the percentage of participants who were correct. For tests eight and nine, which required descriptions, the researchers used a 0–4 scoring method. To assess the reliability of the scoring method, the researchers brought in 14 raters to see if they could identify which tasks were described in test number eight.
Schmolck et al. (2002) found that:
The results suggest impairments in semantic knowledge are related to damage to the lateral temporal cortex. This finding suggests different parts of the brain are responsible for semantic and episodic long-term memory.
Let us now evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the Schmolck et al. (2002) study.
The strengths of the research are:
High reliability.
The researchers used 14 raters to score the transcribed data. Reliability can be assumed if the raters have similar scores.
The procedure of the study is standardised and therefore easy to repeat.
Application: semantic memory in psychology and theories of semantic theory.
The research can show how the damage of specific brain regions leads to the impairment of semantic knowledge.
The study used a matched-pairs design, so it is more certain that the differences in performance are due to the brain lesions and not to other variables such as age.
The weaknesses of the research are:
Generalisability – the research used a small sample, so it is difficult to generalise the results. Therefore, we can argue that the results lack external validity.
Potential ethical issues – since the patients have brain damage, there is a question of whether they can give proper informed consent.
Low ecological validity – as researchers did the study in a lab setting, it could have influenced the participant’s behaviour, causing validity issues.
When a person has damage in the temporal lobe, they may have impairments with long-term semantic memory.
Damage to the lateral temporal cortex can affect semantic memory.
Episodic memory is generated in the medial temporal lobe.
Patients with bilateral medial temporal lobe lesions may have difficulties remembering episodic memories.
People who have medial temporal lobe damage may have memory impairment issues. These issues include difficulties remembering episodic memories.
of the users don't pass the Semantic Knowledge in Patient HM quiz! Will you pass the quiz?
Start QuizBe perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.
Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.
Create and find flashcards in record time.
Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.
Have all your study materials in one place.
Upload unlimited documents and save them online.
Identify your study strength and weaknesses.
Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.
Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.
Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.
Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.
Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.