What is the difference between relevant costing and irrelevant costing?
Relevant costing involves costs that will be directly affected by a specific business decision in the future, such as opportunity costs or avoidable costs. Irrelevant costing involves costs that will not be influenced by the decision, often including sunk costs or fixed overheads that remain constant regardless of the outcome.
How does relevant costing impact decision-making in business?
Relevant costing impacts decision-making by focusing on costs directly associated with specific business decisions, ignoring sunk costs and unchanged costs. It helps businesses evaluate the financial implications of alternatives, optimize resource allocation, and enhance the decision-making process for short-term objectives, such as pricing and special orders.
What are the criteria for a cost to be considered relevant in decision-making?
A cost is considered relevant in decision-making if it is future-oriented, differs between alternatives, and affects the outcome of the decision. Irrelevant costs are those that are either already incurred (sunk costs) or do not differ among the considered courses of action.
What are some common examples of relevant costs in business decisions?
Relevant costs in business decisions include direct materials, direct labor, variable overheads, incremental costs, opportunity costs, and any future costs that will be directly affected by the decision. They exclude sunk costs, committed costs, and any overheads that won't change regardless of the decision.
How can relevant costing be applied to budgeting?
Relevant costing can be applied to budgeting by identifying and including only the costs and revenues that will change as a result of a specific decision. This approach helps in excluding sunk costs and including opportunity costs, thereby enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of budgeting decisions.